Thursday, December 31, 2009

On the Jewish Funding, Control, and Leadership of the Third Reich






Source: Willie Martin Archive

When Adolph Hitler began attracting attention beyond Germany with his anti-Jewishness, the Jew Cahilla in America selected James P. Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb, & Co. to finance him so as to build up a Nationalist Germany, then push Anglo-Saxondom into attacking Germany and thus, break the back of Christianity in Central Europe so as to pave the way for Jewry to seize all of Europe in the name of Russia in the final prelude to the destruction of the White Race and the establishing of Satan’s World Empire.

Major Robert H. Williams reported in his “Williams Intelligence Summary” for February, 1950, about James P. Warburg’s part in the plot against Christendom. He said:

“Last November, the widow of the late General Ludendroff, on trial at Nuremberg, explained why her husband broke with Hitler, confirmed the reports in convincing detail.

She stated that, ‘...as early as the summer of 1929, James P, Warburg had undertaken an assignment from financial circles in America, which desired to exercise solitary influence on Germany in the unleashing of a national revolution. Warburg’s task was to find the suitable man in Germany, and he entered into contract with Adolph Hitler who subsequently received sums of money amounting to 27 million dollars up to January 30, 1932, and still another seven million dollars thereafter, enabling him to finance his movement.’”

After the 1919 German Revolution, Jewry took over the country lock, stock, and barrel. Jewry retained power until Hitler came on the scene. Then why was international Jewry so anxious to foment a NATIONALIST revolution in Germany? Because they desired to destroy the Royal Judah tribe of Israel (the Nordic Germans) because Jewry could not absorb them in mongrelization; and to destroy Christianity in Central Europe.

After Adolph Hitler received the financial assistance he disenfranchised the Jews in Germany, then set up a banking system of his own. Nevertheless, Anglo-American Intelligence Services learned that Hitler, Jew Rudolph Hess, and Von Papen secretly called on Jew Baron Kurt von Schroeder in Cologne and obtained his guarantee to further finance Hitler’s schemes.

Schroeder agreed to the proposition after bribing Hitler to place Jews in strategical positions to direct the very heart beat of National Socialism. Hitler made Jew Hjalmar Schachet the Director of the Reich Bank. Rudolph Hess became Deputy Fuhrer. He is the son of an Egyptian Jewess. General von Haushofer was made Geopolitical Minister. He is a Jew. General Milh became head of the Luftwaffe. He is a Jew. Goebbels was with Hitler to the end. He was a Jew. All of which is in accordance with Jewry’s protocol No. 15 which says:

“But, if there should arise in its midst a plot, then at the head of that plot will be no other than one of most trusted servants.”

Baron Kurt von Schroeder was related to Baron von Schroeder of J.H. Schroeder & Co., Ltd., London, England, which, together with Messrs. N.M. Rothschild & Sons’ Rutgers, Ltd., and the Imperial Chemical Industries assisted James P. Warburg of Kuhn, Loeb & Co., finance Hitler in accordance with protocol No. 9, which says:

“Nowadays, if any State raises a protest against us, it is only ‘pro forma’ at our direction and at our discretion, for their anti-Semitism is indispensable to us for the management of our lesser brethren.”



Related Posts:

- MUST SEE: The Nazi-Zionist Connection: The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler - Documentary video by Jim Condit, Jr.

- Adolf Hitler - A puppet of International Jewry tasked with the destruction of Germany

- Occultist Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party tools of the Synagogue of Satan; "persectuted" lesser jews as pretext for creation of state of 'Israel'

- Was the Nazi Party Controlled Opposition, Top Leadership Jews and Crypto-Jews?

- "Adolf Hitler - Founder of Israel" by Hennecke Kardel

- Hitler - The Ultimate Zionist False Flag Operation

- History of Judas Goat Kosher Nazis in the White Nationalist Movement

- Canadian Jewish Congress Organized Canadian Nazi Party

- Adolf Hitler's DNA shows North African and Ashkenazi Jew ancestry








Other Articles of Interest:
- Dachau - The U.S. Army and Government lies about "extermination" and "homicidal gas chambers"
- Yahshua the Messiah was not a 'jew'
- The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race
- Yahweh Prohibits Race-Mixing and Commands Racial Purity and Segregation


Monday, December 28, 2009

Susan Cernyak-Spatz's Holo tale- Ate "sawdust salami", jews went to gas chambers "willingly", "whole German nation clothed by clothing from dead jews"









Susan is an Austrian jew who became a university Professor and self-styled expert on the Holyhoax.

As the story goes, Susan was taken to Auschwitz at 18 years old, where she ate "sawdust salami", and had to eat and poop out the same bowl. Sometimes, she ate grass and frogs.

She claims the Nazis had killed 2 million Polish jews by 1941, and that holocausting jews by bullets was too costly because they needed the bullets for the war, so the Germans built the "death camps."

Cernyak-Spatz says the Germans were so determined to kill every last jew that "trains carrying Jews to the death camps were given priority even over troop trains carrying soldiers to battle." Is that a contradiction from her claim about not holocausting by bullets due to the priority of the war effort?...moving on.

The Germans told the Jews to wear lots of clothes for work, and then they gassed them, and stole the Jews' clothes. According to Susan, "for the years during the war, the whole German nation was clothed from the clothing of dead Jews."

Death in the Birkenau gas chambers took only 8 minutes, says Susan, and the Nazis used jew hair to "stuff mattresses, for insulation, and wove it into cloth." Between 1,500 and 2,000 Jews died in the chambers at Birkenau every day. Some jews even volunteered and went to the gas chambers willingly!

Then Susan almost died from typhus. Susan also survived scabies, scarlet fever, and hepatitis. It's a miracle she survived. Because the Nazis gassed everyone who got sick.

When they abandoned the camp with the Soviets advancing, for some reason Susan can not explain, the camp commandant opened up the warehouse, and told the Jews to take the warmest clothes they could find. Even though the Germans were trying to kill all the Jews.

Then they Death Marched Susan to Berlin. But Susan didn't die, so they Death Marched her again. Then the Nazi's turned the Jews over to the Allies.

Susan tells us the sacred 6 million will "die again if they are forgotten."




Article: "Woman captivates students with tales of life in Nazi death camp"




Note: use http://www.archive.org/ to find article if original link no longer works

Thursday, December 24, 2009

MUST READ: "Blueprint for Bondage" by Scott D. McQuate






I read this book almost two years ago, and it is probably the most eye-opening and important book (aside from the Bible), I've read. It is from the "Christian Identity" perspective and for the serious truthseeker, with stunning insights into the true meanings of the Scriptures (which have been hidden by deceptive translations), including much information that will be new and challenging even to those immersed in CI (eg, exposing a certain false apostle). I would also highly recommend it for those who are agnostic or irreligious, as the book provides key knowledge regarding the origin of the "NWO conspiracy" (ie, the Edomite Jews who are the sons of Cain, who was the son of Satan). The author is "on target" on virtually every issue, covering a wide range of topics critical to the "Christian" truly seeking to obey YHWH.





Info on the book from the official website:

Blueprint For Bondage
Has Already Been Highly Acclaimed And Heralded As A Classic By Readers All Around The World. It Is The Result Of Years Of Painstaking Research By A PhD Candidate From Ohio Who Stunned His Professors By Uncovering An Ancient Coded Message, Written By Freemasons, Within The Ancient Hebrew Language Of The Bible, Exposing The Intentional Deception And Destruction Of The Unwitting Masses During What The Bible Refers To As The Last Days.






Reviews:

"A HIGHLY INTERESTING AND POWERFULLY ILLUMINATING WORK. Sin, the breaking of God's Law on the national level, as well as the personal, has shattering effects which move out into the world like ripples on a pond and form the bonds of our own slavery. Everything from economic laws to the consequences of multiculturalism are discussed on the literal level with a fascinating symbolic examination of the Song of Solomon. AN ABSOLUTELY EYE-OPENING BOOK! McQUATE HAS HIT ONE OUT OF THE PARK. A MUST READ!"
- Scott Michaels
Geophysicist, Theologian, Teacher, Author of How We Should Then Live and The Mid-Night-Morning Trilogy

"THIS IS A MUST READ BOOK for serious Bible researchers who are seeking a deeper understanding of the real events of the Garden in Eden. For many, the Song of Solomon was only an interesting curiosity without any importance or significance outside of its own content. Not only has McQuate shared his new insights on the Song of Solomon but he has also joined the ranks of other pioneers in exposing the apostasy of the false prophet in the Bible in the process."

- Tom Miller
Writer, Researcher, Theologia

"I DON'T HAVE WORDS TO DESCRIBE THIS BOOK, EXCEPT THAT IT IS A MUST READ for any member of the Bride of Yashua that wants to know the truth. McQuate exposes the lies that the majority of the members of Yashua's Bride don't even know about.Thank you for writing such a life changing book and YHWH bless you.
- Wessel H.


IN BLUEPRINT FOR BONDAGE YOU WILL LEARN:

* What actually happened in the Garden in Eden and why it's been covered up!
* What secret society has infiltrated the church (yes, YOUR church) for the Bride's destruction
* The real reasons for the disease of division in the Church and in America
* How God's people and Americans in general have been intentionally deceived for their planned destruction
* The real reasons for Global Warming . . . they're not what you think!
* Why the movie War Of The Worlds is not just fantasy!
* Why aliens are real and who those about to arrive on our world truly are!
* Why the financial climate in America will only get worse - quickly!
* Why you need to prepare for the collapse of America and the world . . . and how!
* That there is a false prophet who has infiltrated the Bible and who he is . . . you will be shocked!
* How this false prophet's destructive doctrines are almost exclusively taught by the church today
* Who God's chosen people are in the Bible and today . . . they're not who you think!
* The never-before-seen hidden message of Solomon, now uncovered by the author!
* How to avoid the devastating and soul-stealing lies preached in today's churches
* How to protect yourself and your family in the coming chaotic days . . .
* And how all of these topics fit together for the endtime plan to destroy God's people and those living with her in Mystery Babylon!






Here is an excerpt from the book:
In the Aramaic Targum, pseudo-Jonathan, which shows us that Genesis 4:1 has obviously been tampered with at some point by these evil infiltrators. It should actually be read as follows; And Adam knew his wife Eve, who was pregnant by Sammael (Satan), and she conceived and bare Cain, and he was like the heavenly beings, and not like the earthly beings, and she said, I have gotten a man from the angel of the Lord. Lest there be any doubt in the readers mind as to the identity of Sammael in this passage, we read in The International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, according to Jewish theology…the destroyer or angel of death appears under the name Sammael (i.e. the poison of God), who was once an arch-angel before the throne of God, and who caused the serpent to tempt Eve. According to Weber, he is not to be distinguished from Satan.

These and other aberrations of our nearly worshipped King James translation of the Bible are not surprising however, as there has been a concerted effort to thwart the purposes of YHWH throughout scripture. This situation is no different. The Holy Scriptures of YHWH seem to be vulnerable to these evil men’s tactics, just as are his people.

We can read where YHWH warns us of such an infiltration, when we read in Jude verse 4 For there are certain men crept in unawares (secretly), who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness (literally unbridled lust, as in the garden), and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.

For further support of this idea of Biblical tampering, we read Sir Thomas Moore’s words in reference to Tyndale, in the Journal of English and Germanic Philology, (Tyndale) was guilty of intentionally mistranslating the Bible. And Tyndale’s translations were one thing that eventually led to his death at the stake!

Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh, in their book entitled The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception also support this idea of deception and tampering by saying, There is virtually unanimous agreement among all the concerned parties … that the history of Dead Sea Scroll scholarship does constitute a scandal. And there would seem to be little doubt that something irregular … lurks behind the delays, the procrastinations, the equivocation, the restrictions on material.








Wednesday, December 23, 2009

"After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation" by Giles MacDonogh







About the book

Description

When the Third Reich collapsed in 1945, the Allied powers converged on Germany and divided it into four zones of occupation. A nation in tatters, in many places literally flattened by bombs, was suddenly subjected to brutal occupation by vengeful victors. Rape was rampant. Hundreds of thousands of Germans and German-speakers died in the course of brutal deportations from Eastern Europe. By the end of the year, Germany was literally starving to death. Over a million German prisoners of war died in captivity, where they were subjected to inadequate rations and often tortured. All told, an astounding 2.25 million German civilians died violent deaths in the period between the liberation of Vienna and the Berlin airlift. A shocking account of a massive and vicious military occupation, After the Reich offers a bold reframing of the history of World War II and its aftermath. Historian Giles MacDonogh has unearthed a record of brutality which has been largely ignored by historians or, worse, justified as legitimate retaliation for the horror of the Holocaust. Drawing on a vast array of contemporary firstperson accounts, MacDonogh has finally given a voice to tens of millions of civilians who, lucky to survive the war, found themselves struggling to survive a hellish peace.

Reviews

Throughout time it has been the victor who has written history, but here historian MacDonogh examines the darker side of the Allied occupation of defeated Germany . . . Of interest to students of modern Europe, complementing W.G. Sebald’s On the Natural History of Destruction (2003) and other studies of history from the point of view of the vanquished.
Kirkus Reviews

MacDonogh has written a grueling but important book. This unhappy story has long been cloaked in silence since telling it suited no one. Not the Allies, because it placed them near the moral nadir of the Nazis; nor the Germans, because they did not wish to be accused of whitewashing Hitler by highlighting what was, by any standard, a war crime. Giles MacDonogh has told a very inconvenient truth.
— Nigel Jones Sunday Telegraph (London)

VE Day on May 8, 1945 mocked the subsequent condition of Europe. As crowds in London, Paris and New York celebrated the declaration of peace, much more misery and death lay ahead. Two, perhaps three million Germans perished in the years that followed: in captivity; from hunger and casual violence; and above all, during the expulsions of ethnic Germans from the east, which the western Allies had agreed with the Russians before hostilities ended. Giles MacDonogh's book chronicles this saga from the liberation of Vienna to the 1948 Berlin Airlift and 1949 formation of Konrad Adenauer's government in Bonn. It makes grimmer reading than most war stories, because there is little redemptive courage or virtue. Here is a catalogue of pillage, rape, starvation, inhumanity and suffering on a titanic scale.... [AFTER THE REICH] book brings together many stories that deserve to be much better known in the West.
— Max Hastings Sunday Times (London)


Full book online



Review of the book (with mention of the work of others in this area, including Ralph Franklin Keeling and James Bacque). Lengthy, but very good read.

Revisiting the "Good War's" Aftermath: Emerging Truth in an Ocean of Myth

Dwight D. Murphey
Wichita State University, retired

[This article was published in the Spring 2009 issue of The Journal
of Social, Political and Economic Studies, pp. 95-110.]


Part I

Those who honestly chronicle human events, present or past, are a rare and honorable breed. We should certainly ennoble them within the pantheon of our earthly gods. As we do so, we will no doubt include those who, not out of alienation against the West or the United States or its people but out of a thirst for truth, are bringing to light the awful events that followed in the wake of World War II (as well as the enormities that were committed as part of the way in which the war was fought against civilian populations, although that is a subject we won't be exploring here).

That war has been known among Americans as "the good war," and those who fought it as "the greatest generation." But now, slowly, we are hit by the realities so commonplace to a complex human existence: there was much that was not good, and along with the self-sacrifice and high intentions there was much that was venal and brutal. These realities are coming to the surface because there are some scholars, at least, who are aware that an ocean of wartime propaganda spawns a myth that continues for several decades and who have a commitment to truth that overrides the many inducements to conform to the myth.

This article began as a simple review of Giles MacDonogh's book that is identified above. His book is largely of the myth-breaking sort I have just praised. Because, however, there is valuable additional material that I am loath to leave unmentioned, I have expanded it to include other information and authors, although leaving it primarily a review of After the Reich.

MacDonogh's is a puzzling book, both brave and craven, mostly (but not entirely) worthy of the high praise we must give to incorruptible scholars. As we have noted, the American public has long thought of the Allied effort in World War II as a "great crusade" that pitted good and decency against Nazi evil. Even after all these years, it is likely that the last thing the public wants to learn is that vast and unspeakable wrongs were committed by both the Western Allies and the Soviet Union during the war and its aftermath. It flies in the face of that reluctance for MacDonogh to tell "the brutal history" at great length.

That willingness is commendable for its intellectual bravery. In light of it, it is puzzling that even as he does so he puts a gloss over that history, in effect continuing in part a cover-up of historic proportions that has been fixed in place by the overhang of wartime propaganda for almost two-thirds of a century.

The great value of his book thus cannot be found in its completeness or its strict candor, but rather in its providing something of a bridge-albeit quite an extensive one-that can start conscientious readers toward further study of an immensely important subject.

For this article, it will be valuable to begin by summarizing the history MacDonogh relates (and to add somewhat to it). It is only after doing this that we will discuss what MacDonogh obscures. All of this will then lead to some concluding reflections.

In his Preface, MacDonogh says his purpose is to "expose the victorious Allies in their treatment of the enemy at peace, for in most cases it was not the criminals who were raped, starved, tortured or bludgeoned to death but women, children and old men." Although this suggests the tone of the book will be one of outrage, the narrative is in the main informative rather than polemical.

MacDonogh's scholarly background includes several books of German and French history and biography (as well as four books on wine).

The expulsions (today called "ethnic cleansing").

At the end of the war, MacDonogh tells us, "as many as 16.5 million Germans were driven from their homes." 9.3 million were expelled from the eastern portion of Germany, which was made a part of Poland.

(Both the eastern and western boundaries of Poland were drastically shifted westward by agreement of the allies, with Poland taking an important part of Germany and the Soviet Union taking eastern Poland.) The other 7.2 million were forced from their ancestral homes in Central Europe where they had lived for generations.

This mass expulsion was settled upon in the Potsdam Agreement in mid-1945, although the Agreement did make it explicit that the ethnic cleansing was to take place "in the most humane manner possible." Churchill was among those who supported it as conducive "to lasting peace."

In fact, the process was so inhumane that it amounted to one of history's great atrocities. MacDonogh reports that "some two and a quarter million would die during the expulsions." This is at the lower end of such estimates, which range from 2.1 million to 6.0 million, if we take only the expellees into account. Konrad Adenauer, very much a friend of the West, found himself able to say that among those expelled "six million GermansS are dead, gone."[1] We will be seeing MacDonogh's account of the starvation and exposure to extreme cold to which the post-war population of Germany was subject, and it is worth mentioning at this point (even though it goes beyond the expulsions) that the historian James Bacque says that "the comparison of the censuses has shown us that some 5.7 million people disappeared inside Germany between October 1946 [a year and a half after the war ended] and September 1950S."[2]

What MacDonogh calls "the greatest maritime tragedy of all time" occurred when the ship the Wilhelm Gustloff, carrying Germans from Danzig in January 1945, was sunk with "anything up to 9,000 people,S many of them children." In mid-1946, "pictures show some of the 586,000 Bohemian Germans packed in box cars like sardines." At another point MacDonogh tells how "the refugees were often packed so tightly that they could not move to defecate and emerged from the trucks covered with excrement. Many were dead on arrival." [This calls to mind the scenes described so vividly in Volume I of Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago.] In Silesia, "streams of civilians were forced from their homes at gunpoint." A priest estimated that a quarter of the German population of one Lower Silesian town killed itself, as entire families committed suicide together.

The condition of the German population--starvation and extreme cold. Germans refer to 1947 as Hungerjahr, the "year of hunger," but MacDonogh says that "even by the winter of 1948 the situation had not been remedied." People ate dogs, cats, rats, frogs, snails, nettles, acorns, dandelion roots and wild mushrooms in a feverish effort to survive. In 1946, the calories provided in the U.S. Zone of Germany dropped to 1,313 by March 18 from the mere 1,550 provided earlier. Victor Gollancz, a British and Jewish author and publisher, objected that "we are starving the Germans."[3] This is similar to the statement made by Senator Homer Capehart of Indiana in a speech to the U. S. Senate on February 5, 1946: "For nine months now this administration has been carrying on a deliberate policy of mass starvationS."[4] MacDonogh tells us that the Red Cross, Quakers, Mennonites and others wanted to bring in food, but "in the winter of 1945 donations were returned with the recommendation that they be used in other war-torn parts of Europe." In the American zone of Berlin, "it was American policy that nothing should be given away and everything should be thrown away. So those German women who worked for the Americans were fantastically well fed, but could take nothing home to their families or children." Bacque says "foreign relief agencies were prevented from sending food from abroad; Red Cross food trains were sent back to Switzerland; all foreign governments were denied permission to send food to German civilians; fertilizer production was sharply reducedS The fishing fleet was kept in port while people starved."[5]

Under the Russian occupation of East Prussia, MacDonogh sees "striking similarities" to Stalin's "deliberate starvation of the Ukrainian kulaks in the early 1930s." As in the Ukraine, "cases of cannibalism were reported, with people eating the flesh of their dead children."

The suffering from extreme cold mixed with the starvation to create misery and a heavy death toll. Even though the winter in 1945-6 was a normal one, "the terrible lack of coal and food was acutely felt." Abnormally cold winters struck in 1946-7 ("possibly the coldest in living memory") and 1948-9. In Berlin alone, 60,000 people were thought to have died within the first ten months after the end of the war; and "the following winter killed off an estimated 12,000 more." People lived in holes among the ruins, and "some Germans-particularly refugees from the east-were virtually naked."

In his book Gruesome Harvest: The Allies' Postwar War Against The German People, Ralph Franklin Keeling cites a quote from a "noted German pastor": "Thousands of bodies are hanging from trees in the woods around Berlin and nobody bothers to cut them down.

Thousands of corpses are carried into the sea by the Oder and Elbe Rivers-one doesn't notice it any longer. Thousands and thousands are starving in the highwaysS Children roam the highways aloneS."[6]

In his The German Expellees: Victims in War and Peace, Alfred-Maurice de Zayas told how in Yugoslavia Marshal Tito used camps as extermination centers to starve Germans.[7]

Mass rape-to which one must add the "voluntary sex" obtained from starving women.

The onslaught of rape by invading Russian forces is, of course, infamous. In the Russian zone of Austria, "rape was part of daily life until 1947 and many women were riddled with VD and had no means to cure it." MacDonogh tells us that "conservative estimates place the number of Berlin women raped at 20,000." When the British arrived in Berlin, "officers later recalled the shock of seeing the lakes in the prosperous west filled with the corpses of women who had committed suicide after being raped." The age of the victim made little difference, with those raped ranging from 12 to 75. Nurses and nuns were among the victims (some as many as fifty times). "The Russians were particularly hard on the nobles, setting fire to their manor houses and raping or killing the inhabitants." Although "most of the unwanted Russian children were aborted," MacDonogh says "it is estimated that between 150,000 and 200,000 'Russian babies' survived." The Russians raped wherever they went, so that it wasn't just German women who were raped, but also women of Hungary, Bulgaria, the Ukraine, and Yugoslavia even though it was on the same side.

There was an official policy against rape, but it was so commonly ignored that "it was only in 1949 that Russian soldiers were presented with any real deterrent." Until then, "they were egged on by [Ilya] Ehrenburg and other Soviet propagandists who saw rape as an expression of hatred."

Although there was a "widespread incidence of rape by American soldiers," there was an enforced military policy against it, with "a number of American servicemen executed" for it. Criminal charges brought for rape "rose steadily" during the final months of the war, but declined sharply thereafter. What did continue was arguably almost as bad: the sexual exploitation of starving women who "voluntarily" sold sexual services for food. In Gruesome Harvest, Keeling quotes from an article in the Christian Century for December 5, 1945: "The American provost marshalS said that rape represents no problem for the military police because 'a bit of food, a bar of chocolate, or a bar of soap seems to make rape unnecessary.'"[8]

The extent of this is shown by the figure MacDonogh provides of an "estimated 94,000 Besatzungskinder or 'occupation children' [who] were born in the American zone." He says that in 1945-6 "many female children resorted to prostitution to survive. Boys, too, performed a service for Allied soldiers."

Keeling, writing for the 1947 publication of his book [which explains his use of the present tense], said there was "an upsurge in venereal diseases which has reached epidemic proportions," and went on to say that "a large proportion of the contamination has originated with colored American troops which we have stationed in great numbers in Germany and among whom the rate of venereal infection is many times greater than among white troops." In July 1946, he says, the annual rate of infection for white soldiers was 19%, for black troops 77.1%. He reiterated the point we are making here when he pointed to "the close connection between the venereal disease rate and availability of food."[9]



If MacDonogh mentions rape by British soldiers, it has escaped me. He does tell, however, of rape by Poles, the French, Tito's partisans, and displaced persons. In Danzig, "the Poles behaved as badly as the RussiansS It was the Poles who liberated the town of Teschen in the north [of Czechoslovakia] on 10 May. For five days they raped, looted, torched and killed." He writes of "French soldiers' behaviour in Stuttgart, where perhaps 3,000 women and eight men were raped," says "a further 500 women [were] raped in Vaihingen," and reports "three days of killing, plunder, arson and rape" in Freundenstadt. Of the displaced persons, he says that "there were around two million POWs and forced labourers from Russia who had formed into gangs and robbed and raped all over central Europe."

Part II

Treatment of the prisoners of war. In all, there were approximately eleven million German prisoners of war. One and a half million of these never returned home. MacDonogh expresses an appropriate outrage here: "To treat them with so little care that a million and a half died was scandalous."

The Red Cross had no role vis a vis those held by the Russians, since the Soviet Union had not signed the Geneva Convention. MacDonogh says the Russians made no distinction between German civilians and prisoners of war, although we know that a KGB report does sort them out for deaths and other purposes. At war's end, they held approximately four to five million within Russia (and here, again, the KGB archives are worth consulting, as historian James Bacque has done; they show a figure of 2,389,560). Large numbers were held for over ten years, being sent back to Germany only after Konrad Adenauer's visit to Moscow in 1956. Nevertheless, in 1979-34 years after the end of the war!-"there were believed to be 72,000 prisoners still alive in-chiefly Russian-custody." Some 90,000 German soldiers were captured at Stalingrad, but only 5,000 made it home.

The Americans made a distinction between the 4.2 million soldiers captured during the war, who were entitled to the shelter and subsistence called for by the Hague and Geneva Conventions, and the 3.4 million captured in the West at its end. MacDonogh says the latter were classified as "Surrendered Enemy Persons" (SEPs) or as "Disarmed Enemy Persons" (DEPs), and were denied the protections of the Conventions. He doesn't give a total figure for those who died in American custody, saying "it is not clear how many German soldiers died of starvation." He tells, however, of several situations: "The most notorious American POW camps were the so-called Rheinwiesenlager." Here, the Americans allowed "anything up to 40,000 German soldiers to die from hunger and neglect in the muddy flats of the Rhine." He says "any attempt to feed the prisoners by the German civilian population was punishable by death." Although the Red Cross was empowered to inspect, "the barbed wire surrounding the SEPs and DEPs was impenetrable."

Elsewhere, at "the Pioneers' Barracks in WormsS there were 30,000-40,000 prisoners sitting in the courtyard, jostling for space. With no protection from the rain they froze." The prisoners were starved at Langwasser, and at a "notorious camp" at Zuffenhausen where "for months lunch was turnip soup, with half a potato for dinner."




It would be a mistake to think that a world food shortage caused the United States to be unable to feed its prisoners. Bacque writes that "Captain Lee Berwick of the 424th Infantry who commanded the guard towers at Camp BretzenheimS told me, 'Food was piled up all round the camp fence.' Prisoners there saw crates piled up 'as high as bungalows.'"[10]

What MacDonogh tells us about Britain's treatment of German POWs seems conflicting. It had 391,880 prisoners working in Britain in 1946, and a total of 600 camps there in 1948. He says "the regime was not so hard, and in terms of percentages the number of men who died in British custody is strikingly low compared to the other Allies." Elsewhere, however, he tells how "the British could evade [the Geneva Convention's stipulation]S that they provide 2,000 to 3,000 calories a day," so that "for most of the time levels fell below 1,500 calories." The British had a camp in Belgium that "was meant to be particularly grueling." There, "conditions for the 130,000 prisoners were reported to be 'not much better than Belsen'S When the camp was inspected in April 1947 there were found to be just four functioning lightbulbsSthere was no fuel, no straw mattresses and no food apart from 'water soup.'"

A Reuters report in December 2005 adds an important dimension: "Britain ran a secret prison in Germany for two years after the end of World War II where inmates including Nazi party members were tortured and starved to death, the Guardian says.

Citing Foreign Office files that were opened after a request under the Freedom of Information Act, the newspaper says Britain had held men and woman [sic] at a prison in Bad Nenndorf until July 1947S 'Threats to execute prisoners, or to arrest, torture and murder their wives and children were considered "perfectly proper" on the grounds that such threats were never carried out,' the paper reports."[11]

The French wanted German labor to help rebuild the country, and for this purpose the British and Americans transferred about a million German soldiers to them. MacDonogh says "their treatment was particularly brutal." Not long after the war, according to the Red Cross, 200,000 of the prisoners were starving.
We are told of a camp "in the Sarthe [where] prisoners had to survive on 900 calories a day."

The stripping of the German economy. Allied leaders disagreed among themselves about the Morgenthau Plan to strip Germany bare of industrial assets and turn it into an agrarian country. The opposition of some and hesitation of others did not, however, prevent a de facto implementation of the plan. By the time the confiscation was ended, Germany was largely bereft of productive assets.

MacDonogh says that under the Russians "Berlin lost around 85 percent of its industrial capacity." Every machine was taken from Vienna. The ships were taken from the Danube, and "one Soviet priority was the seizure of any important works of art found in the capital [Vienna]. This was a fully planned operation." But "worse than the full-scale removal of the industrial base of the land was the abduction of men and women to develop industry in the Soviet Union."

Under the Americans, the dismantling of industrial sites continued until General Lucius Clay stopped it a year after war's end. Until Clay acted, Clause 6 of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Order 1067 embodied the Morgenthau Plan. MacDonogh says that where "American official theft was carried out on a massive scale" was in "seizing scientists and scientific equipment."

The British took much for themselves and passed other industrial property on to "client states" such as Greece and Yugoslavia. The British royal family received Goering's yacht, and the British zone of Germany was stripped of "plants that might later offer competition with British industries." MacDonogh says "the BritishS had their own brand of organized theft in [something called] T-Force, which sought to glean any industrial wizardryS."

For their part, the French asserted "the right to plunder." "The FrenchS made no bones about pocketing a chlorine business in Rheinfelden, a viscose business in Rottweil, the Preussag mines or the chemicals groups Rhodia,"S and much more.

If the Plan had been fully implemented over a longer period of time, the effects would have been calamitous. Keeling, in Gruesome Harvest, says that by seeking "the permanent destruction of Germany's industrial heartland" it would have had as an "ineluctable consequenceS the death through starvation and disease of millions and tens of millions of Germans."[12]

The forced repatriation of Russians to Stalin. MacDonogh's book limits itself to the Allied occupation, but there are, of course, many other aspects of the aftermath of the war that deserve mention, although here we will limit ourselves to just one of them. (MacDonogh does give some details about it.) It is the Allied repatriation of captured Russians to the Soviet Union. In The Secret Betrayal, Nikolai Tolstoy tells how between 1943 and 1947, a total of 2,272,000 Russians were returned. The Soviets harvested 2,946,000 more from the parts of Europe taken by the Red Army. Those sent to the Soviet Union by the Western democracies included thousands of people who were Tsarist emigres and had never lived under the Soviet regime. Tolstoy says that even though there were many who did want to return to Russia (while many others desperately did not, and were sent back, in effect, kicking and screaming), they were uniformly brutalized, executed, raped or made into slaves. Some of the repatriates were Russians who had volunteered to fight for Germany against the Soviet Union and who were led by General Vlasov. Some were Cossacks, many of whom were not even Soviet citizens. The violent repatriations began in August 1945. Tolstoy recounts how deception, clubbings, bayonets, and even threats from a flame-throwing tank were employed to force the removal.[13]

Victors' justice. When the war was over, there was a consensus among the Allies' leaders that the top Nazis should be put to death. Some wanted immediate execution, others "a drumhead court martial." There was an odd virtue in the insistence by the British on following "legal forms," which is what was decided upon. The result was a series of trials with the trappings of normal judicial proceedings, but that were actually a travesty from the point of view of the "rule of law," lacking both the spirit and particulars of "due process." In two chapters, MacDonogh gives an account of the main Nuremberg trial and of the series of trials that continued for years afterwards. Among these, the Americans conducted several trials in Nuremberg after the main one; thousands of cases were brought before "denazification courts"; the German courts, after they were operational, continued the process; and of course we know of Israel's trial and execution of Eichmann.

There are many reasons to call it "victors' justice."

For it to have been otherwise, a truly impartial tribunal would have had to have been convened somewhere in the world (if such a thing had been possible in the aftermath of a world war), and war crimes committed by all sides prosecuted. But, of course, we know that such impartial justice was not in contemplation. In the Nuremberg indictment, the Nazis were charged with the mass killing of the Polish officer corps at the Katyn Forest, a charge that was discretely (and with great intellectual and "judicial" dishonesty) overlooked in the final judgment after it became clear to all that the Soviet Union had done the killing.[14] Another of the many possible examples would be that Nazi deportations were charged as both a war crime and a crime against humanity at Nuremberg. By contrast, no one was ever "brought to justice" for the Allies' expulsion of the millions of Germans from their ancestral homes in central Europe.

A source readers will find instructive. Because of the credibility of its source, the account given by U.S. Air Force Major (retired) Arthur D. Jacobs in his book The Prison Called Hohenasperg will be useful to readers as they absorb (and assess) the information contained in MacDonogh's book and those of the other authors referred to here. It is valuable as a story both of American brutality and American compassion.

Jacobs spent 22 years in the Air Force, retiring in 1973, and then became a member of the faculty at Arizona State University for another twenty years. His book tells the following personal story: His German parents emigrated to the United States from Germany in 1928 and 1929. They had two sons born in Brooklyn (who were hence U.S. citizens), one of them Arthur Jacobs. The boys lived their early years in Brooklyn, attending elementary school.
The family was taken and held for some time at Ellis Island near the end of the war, and was then interned for seven months at the Crystal City Internment Camp in Texas, where they were well treated. They were "voluntarily repatriated" to Germany (after being threatened with deportation) in October 1945, several months after Germany's surrender.

When they arrived in Germany, Jacobs' mother was sent to one camp, the father and two sons to another. The latter reached an internment camp in Hohenasperg after a 92-hour journey locked inside a boxcar in freezing weather with mostly women and children, fed only bread and water, and "without heat, without blankets, and without toilets, except for an open, stinking bucket." Jacobs himself was twelve, and turned thirteen during his week at Hohenasperg before he was sent to another camp at Ludwigsburg. At the Hohenasperg prison, he was placed under strict discipline as a prisoner, and guards threatened him repeatedly with hanging if he disobeyed.

The camp at Ludwigsburg was in effect a holding center pending release. It is informative that Jacobs tells us of the meager diet: "At breakfast we received one glass of 'gray' milk and one slice of black bread. There was no lunch meal." At supper, "each person received one bowl of soup..., mostly water flavored by bouillon. There were no second helpingsS I always had hunger pangs." While he and his brother were at Ludwigsburg, they were forced to watch films of German death camps.

The mother, father and brothers were released from their respective camps in mid-March 1946, and went to live with Jacobs' grandparents in the British Zone. They weren't welcomed by Germans they met, because "we were four more mouths to feed." Jacobs saw that "Germany was war-torn and starving." He was befriended by an American soldier, who got him a job with Graves Registration. He lost his job when the soldier was transferred, and it became a struggle to "live through this starvation period-the winter of 1946-1947." After much knocking about, he got another job with the American Army, this time in a motor pool. An American woman took an interest in him who knew of a ranch couple in southwest Kansas who would bring them to America to live with them. Accordingly, Jacobs and his brother left for the United States in October 1947. They had been in Germany for 21 months. It was eleven years before Jacobs saw his parents again. He went on, as we have said, to become a career officer in the U.S. Air Force. After obtaining his MBA at Arizona State University, he became an industrial engineer and later a member of the ASU faculty.
Part III
Germans


If MacDonogh wrote all that we have reported (and more) from his book, how can it be said that in important ways he continued the cover-up of such horrors, a cover-up that since 1945 has consigned them to a memory hole? This brings us to the book's deficiencies, which are of such a nature as to give readers a lessened realization of the extent of the atrocities and of who was responsible for them.

Most egregious is MacDonogh's treatment of the work of Canadian historian James Bacque, author of Other Losses and Crimes and Mercies. When he refers to the first of these books, he says that Bacque "claimed the French and Americans had killed a million POWs," a claim that "was called a work of 'monstrous speculation' and was dismissed by an American historian as an 'absurd thesis.'"

According to MacDonogh, "it has since been proved that Bacque misinterpreted the words 'other losses' on Allied charts to mean 'deaths'S." Accordingly, he speaks of "Bacque's red herring." So greatly does he dismiss Bacque that in a section on "Further Reading" at the end of the book, MacDonogh apparently forgets about Bacque entirely, saying that "on the treatment of POWs there is nothing in English, and the leading American expert-Arthur L. Smith-publishes in German."

I thought it fair to ask Bacque what his response is to MacDonogh's dismissal. Bacque replied that "the word speculation describes my critics well, because it is they who have not been in all the relevant archives and who have not interviewed the thousands of survivors who have written to newspapers, TV journalists and other authors about their near-death experiences in the camps of the Americans, French and Russians."

Far from admitting that he had misinterpreted the category of "Other Losses," Bacque says that "the meaning of the termS was explained to me by Colonel Philip S. Lauben, United States Army, who was in charge of movements of prisoners for SHAEF in 1945. I have the interview on tape and Lauben's signature on a letter confirming this. Lauben has never denied what he told me."

Lauben later told the BBC that he was "mistaken," but the likelihood of a mistake is slight since he was a responsible officer on the ground and saw both the camps and the reports.

The difference between MacDonogh's and Bacque's treatment of the subject of German prisoners of war in American hands is apparent when we compare the attention each gives to the cutting off of food. MacDonogh reports in one sentence that "any attempt to feed the prisoners by the German civilian population was punishable by death." This is astounding in itself and certainly deserves explication. Bacque tells us considerably more: "General Eisenhower sent out an 'urgent courier' throughout the huge area that he commanded, making it a crime punishable by death for German civilians to feed prisoners. It was even a death-penalty crime to gather food together in one place to take it to prisoners." He says "the order was sent in German to the provincial governments, ordering them to distribute it immediately to local governments.

Copies of the orders were discovered recently in several villages near the RhineS." On pages 42-3 of Crimes and Mercies, Bacque publishes a German and an English copy of a letter dated May 9, 1945, by which district officials were notified of the prohibition.

Bacque provides evidence such as that of Professor Martin Brech of Mahopac, NY, who was a guard at the U.S. camp at Aldernach in Germany. Brech said that "he fed some loaves of bread through the wire, and was told by his superior officer, 'Don't feed them. It is our policy that these men not be fed.'" "Later, at night, Brech sneaked some more food into the camp, and the officer told him, 'If you do that again, you'll be shot.'"

Thus, we find in Bacque a much sharper description and attribution of responsibility than we do in MacDonogh. In light of the immense detail given in MacDonogh's book, this would be forgivable were it not for his attempt to blot out the work of a major scholar who has studied the subject exhaustively.

A similar cutting-short diminishes a reader's comprehension of other important subjects, which MacDonogh touches on so briefly that the reader is hardly able to form a full mental picture. For example, MacDonogh tells how in the execution of Joachim von Ribbentrop at Nuremberg "the hangman botched the execution and the rope throttled the former foreign minister for twenty minutes before he expired." In his book Nuremberg: The Last Battle, historian David Irving tells considerably more, including the fact that the gallows had been designed in a way that allowed the trapdoor to swing back and smash "every bone" in the faces of Keitel, Jodl and Frick. He says that Goering's body (after Goering had committed suicide by taking poison) "was dragged into the execution chamberS [where] the army doctors [made] frantic attempts to revive him so that he could be hanged."

There are a number of places at which MacDonogh half-tells about something important, only to leave it incomplete. We've already noted his mention of "30,000-40,000 prisoners sitting in the courtyard [at the Pioneers' Barracks in Worms]S With no protection against the rain they froze." We are left to guess the consequences of their freezing. At another place, he reports that "the Americans maintained camps for up to 1.5 millionS Nazis or members of the SS." That is his only mention of those camps, which one might suppose were even more punitive than the others. Was MacDonogh too overloaded with other detail to pursue such matters further? Did he deliberately refrain from exploring certain things? Or was the failure due a scatter-gun recital of fragmentary details?

A reader will need to assess the degree to which After the Reich is a work of scholarship as distinguished from a narrative for popular reading. MacDonogh includes many pages of endnotes, citing a large number of sources. Very occasionally, he speaks critically of a given source. But for the most part he accepts whatever a given source has to tell. The book would profit greatly from a bibliographical essay in which he would evaluate the principal sources, sharing with the reader a careful analysis of the evidentiary basis for his narrative.

An example of where a critical evaluation is essential comes with his reference, say, to Ilse Koch's "lampshades and trophies made from human skin and organs," which MacDonogh says the psychologist Saul Padover claims to have been shown. We need to know what MacDonogh would conclude if MacDonogh were to consider the counter-evidence that calls the lampshade collection a "legend."

The same holds true for MacDonogh's many citations to Raul Hilberg's The Destruction of the European Jews. There is a vast scholarly literature questioning every aspect of the Holocaust. One would never know that that literature exists from reading MacDonogh, who either doesn't know of it or finds it prudent, as so many do, not to mention it.

Notwithstanding the book's limitations, After the Reich accomplishes much when it provides another link in the chain of disclosures that, over time, are providing conscientious readers with a more complete understanding of modern history.

The fact that, at the time of the events and for so many decades thereafter, enormities of the greatest importance have been scrubbed clean by propaganda suggests implications far beyond the events themselves. The British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli observed that "all great events have been distorted, most of the important causes concealed," and went on to say that "If the history of England is ever written by one who has the knowledge and the courage, the world would be astonished."[15] The implications suggest profound questions, which we would be remiss not to mention:

How is it that a certain version of reality can, on so many subjects, hold almost total sway, while the voices of millions and of a good many serious scholars are marginalized into nothingness? (Fortunately, so far as Bacque's work is concerned, it is available in twelve languages in 13 countries, even though it has long been unavailable in the United States.)

Do we really know the truth about much of anything? Or are countless subjects veiled in a miasma of omission and distortion?

Where are our academic historians? Most historians like to give us pleasing myths, which is something expected of them and for which they are rewarded with medals, prizes and high sales.

How pervasive is a cravenness that will put almost anything ahead of a search for truth? Does mankind care very deeply about truth?

To what extent is a society or an age "democratic" if its citizens' minds are filled with phantoms, so that most of the judgments they make are either vacuous or manipulated?

And to what extent is it "democratic" if those citizens don't even have a vital say in decisions of the gravest importance?

It is significant that Keeling says that "the people of no nation in modern history, including ourselves, have ever enjoyed an important voice in the making of the great decisions either of going to war or of framing the peace arrangements."[16]

Dwight D. Murphey

[1] Adenauer is quoted in James Bacque, Crimes and Mercies: The Fate of German Civilians Under Allied Occupation, 1944-1950
(Boston: Little, Brown and Company (Canada) Limited, 1997), p. 119.
Readers may wish also to consult Theodore Schieder, ed., The Expulsion of the German Population from the Territories East of the Oder-Neisse-Line (Bonn: Federal Ministry for Expellees, Refugees and War Victims, 1958). Alfred-Maurice de Zayas is the author of three additional books on this subject: The German Expellees: Victims in War and Peace (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1986); A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans, 1944-50 (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994); and Nemesis at Potsdam: The Expulsion of the Germans from the East (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1988).

[3] See two books by Victor Gollancz on the treatment of refugees: Our Threatened Values and In Darkest Germany.

[4] Capehart is quoted in Ralph Franklin Keeling, Gruesome Harvest: The Allies' Postwar War Against The German People (Torrance, CA: Institute for Historical Review edition, 1992), p. 64. The book was first published in 1947 by the Institute of American Economics in Chicago.

[5] Bacque, Crimes and Mercies, p. 91.

[6] Keeling, Gruesome Harvest, p. 64.

[7] Zayas, de, The German Expellees, p. 97.

[8] Keeling, Gruesome Harvest, p. 64.

[9] Keeling, Gruesome Harvest, pp. 62, 63.

[10] Bacque, "A Truth So Terrible," Abuse Your Illusions; article sent to me by author.

[11] "Britain Ran Torture Camp After WWII: report http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsite.

[12] Keeling, Gruesome Harvest, p. VI.

[13] Nikolai Tolstoy, The Secret Betrayal (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1977), pp. 371, 24, 315, 40, 183, 242, 343.
Readers will do well to read, as well, Julius Epstein, Operation Keelhaul: The Story of Forced Repatriation from 1944 to the Present (Old Greenwich, CN: 1973) and Nicholas Bethell, The Last Secret: Forcible Repatriation to Russia 1944-7 (London, 1974).

[14] See the discussion of the Katyn Forest killings in Bacque, Crimes and Mercies, pp. 74-5, 135.

[15] Disraeli is quoted in Keeling, Gruesome Harvest, p. 135.

[16] Keeling, Gruesome Harvest, p. 134.





Related Articles:

The post-war genocide of at least three million Germans by the Western Allies - Eisenhower's Death Camps

"Crimes and Mercies" by James Bacque: the genocide of 9 to 14 million ethnic Germans under Allied occupation from 1944-1950

Unspeakable Atrocities - New German film on the greatest mass rape in history - 2 million German women raped by the Judeo-Bolsheviks from 1945-49

Hidden History: The Starvation of Around One Million Germans by Allied Naval Blockade Following WWI - Bolshevik Revolutions In Germany circa 1919

Suppressed Colossal War Crime & Tragedy - Soviets murder 3.5 million German POWs & half a million ethnic German civilians in Gulags circa WW2

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Flashback - Obama's comments on rural white Pennsylvanians touch on key goals of Jewish communist agenda for destruction of White-Christian society

Senator Whitehouse's recent comments reminded me of those of his idol:



"You go into these small towns in Pennsylvania and, like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them....And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy toward people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations." -Barack Obama, April 6, 2008 remarks at fundraiser in San Francisco


Obama's Slip Revealed His True Colors

by Henry Makow
April 15, 2008

[...]

Obama's remarks were incendiary because he let his mask slip and showed his true feelings. He is a Communist. His father and mother were Communists and he is proud of his heritage.

[...]

As I have said, the Illuminati is enslaving us by destroying the four pillars of human identity: race, religion, nation and family. This is also the Communist platform.

Obama's statement demonizes people who resist their rapacious and evil program. This is what Communists (and Socialists and Liberals) do as a reflex. They need to dehumanize people who believe in God and want to preserve their country, heritage and family. They need to believe we are prejudiced, hate-filled fanatics, yokels and fascists. They cannot see how they have been brainwashed.

[...]

Obama depicts religion as an irrational prejudice fed by economic frustration. "Antipathy to people who aren't like them" refers to the homosexual and feminist activists who are destroying the institution of the family. "Anti immigrant or anti trade sentiment" refers to policies that protect national or racial character. "Guns" refers to the necessity to render these people powerless.

Obama managed to touch all the bases.

[...]

Monday, December 21, 2009

Sen. Whitehouse: Foes of government takeover and destruction of health care are "birthers, right-wing militias, Aryan groups"

Given that a great majority of white Americans are opposed to the Obama/Democrat health care bill, I guess that makes virtually all whites "racists."

If the anti-white communist demonrats are going to spew this hatred of white people non-stop and just smear all white conservaties as "racists" anyway, perhaps more and more whites will see that being "racist" is not the "evil" the liberal/jewish establishment and media makes it out to be.

Me thinks thou doth protest too much?



source: Washington Times Weblog

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) today took shots at those who are not supporting the health care legislation. During a floor speech, he excoriated Senate GOP members for up holding the pending health care bill and accused their supporters of being birthers and fanatics in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups. He started off by citing an editorial from the Manchester Journal Inquirer, which used insults like "lunatic fringe.":

(WATCH THE VIDEO HERE about 116:06 in. 2:55pm EST)

“Let's Look At What Current Observers Are Saying As A Possible Early Indicator Of The Judgment History Will Inflict. Recently, The Editor Of The Manchester Journal Inquirer Editorial Page Wrote Of The Current G.O.P. Which He Called ‘This Once Great And Now Mostly Shameful Party,’ That ‘It Has Gone Crazy, Is More And More Dominated By The Lunatic Fringe And Has Poisoned Itself With Hate.’ He Concluded, ‘They No Longer Want To Govern. They Want To Emote.’ A Well Regarded Philadelphia Columnist Recently Wrote Of The Conservative Paranoia And Lunacy On The Republican Right.”

After explaining why absent GOP members who did not vote for the Department of Defense spending bill was tantamount to a "no" vote, he went on to say that Republicans and their supporters just want to "break" the momentum of President Obama.:


"Voting 'no' and hiding from the vote are the same result. Those of us on the floor see it. It was clear the three of them who did not cast their yes votes until all 60 Senate votes had been tallied and it was clear that the result was a foregone conclusion. And why? Why all this discord and discourtesy, all this unprecedented destructive action? All to break the momentum of our new young president.

They are desperate to break this president. They have ardent supporters who are nearly hysterical at the very election of President Barack Obama. The birthers, the fanatics, the people running around in right-wing militia and Aryan support groups, it is unbearable to them that President Barack Obama should exist. That is one powerful reason. It is not the only one."


Interesting comments below story, ~98% in vehement opposition to the Communist Senator's comments and the health care destruction bill:

d_reardon:
"Sen. Whitehouse: foes of health care bill are birthers, right-wing militias, aryan groups" That's true. As well as every other person with a brain in their heads.

dennisl59:
FACT: This 'Bill' mandates every single American Taxpayer to buy Insurance under penalty of Law, enforced by the IRS. This is Tyranny. Pure and Simple. Anyone who denies this FACT, is a Fool, Moron, and Useful Idiot. And that there are 'Senators' that voted for this proves one thing-They are Traitors to their Oath of Office.

Las Vegas high school teacher dares to tell the truth, denies Holohoax in classroom - Jews cause hullabaloo, are "outraged"



Article: Teacher's Holocaust denial causes uproar

Saturday, December 19, 2009

"Adolf Hitler - Founder of Israel" by Hennecke Kardel






Kardel's book presents events leading to and the people responsible for the World War II, the Holocaust, the creation of the State of Israel and other historical events. It also shows in great detail the reasons and explains how and why it was possible for those events to happen. This book is a highly recommended reading for all the History Buffs, the Jews and non-Jews alike. [1]


Book in PDF

Typical signs of Jewish features are: Eyes are usually shiny and both eye lids are heavy and swollen. The lymphbag under the eyes is usually fuller and stands out more than on Gentiles. The high cheekbone as a rule creates a sunken cheek. The nose can only be differentiated by its slightly moving nose wings when viewed from the front during breathing. The upper lip is short and the lower lip stands out and this gives the face a sensual expression." Source: Twelve volumes "Jewish Encyclopedia" on all questions pertaining Jewry and the Jewish curious nature and notions.






The main supporters of fulfilling the "Work of Masters" were Reinhard Heydrich, predominantly Jewish (above) and the full Jew Adolf Eichmann (below). As the organizer of the Jewish emigration prior to the Second World War Eichmann traveled to the country which today is Israel.































[click pics to enlarge]


source





Related Articles:

- MUST SEE: The Nazi-Zionist Connection: The Final Solution to Adolf Hitler - Documentary video by Jim Condit, Jr.
- On the Jewish Funding, Control, and Leadership of the Third Reich
- Adolf Hitler's DNA shows North African and Ashkenazi Jew ancestry
- Occultist Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party tools of the Synagogue of Satan; "persectuted" lesser jews as pretext for creation of state of 'Israel'
- Was the Nazi Party Controlled Opposition, Top Leadership Jews and Crypto-Jews?
- Hitler - The Ultimate Zionist False Flag Operation
- History of Judas Goat Kosher Nazis in the White Nationalist Movement
- Canadian Jewish Congress Organized Canadian Nazi Party


Thursday, December 17, 2009

What if?

By Mike James in Germany – 12 December 2009

What if we could live in Freedom without Fear of speaking our minds
Without Fear of prosecution or false imprisonment
Upbraiding the Enemies who live amongst us without litigation
And the prospect of being hauled before the Sanhedrin?

What if God walks amongst us and is our Friend?

What if those who Presume to govern us become our Servants
And listen to the yearnings of our hearts’ own desires
To live in a world free of usury, Zionism and economic servitude
So that our children have a Future and will never be slaves?

What if God walks amongst us and is our Provider?

What if we were Free to earn by the sweat of our brows
Bounty enough to provide for our wives, our families and our friends
Without the Usurious Theft of the produce of our Exploited Labours
Purloined by those who feed upon the peculation of our Dignity?

What if God walks amongst us and gives succour to our cause?

What if we were to see among homeless Europeans and Americans
Our negligence to challenge the Lies of the Bolshevik New World Order
And the environmental Eco-Fascism born of a Hatred of Mankind
Serving only to aggrandise the Parasitic Elites and Satan’s Bankers?

What if God walks amongst us and brings Tears of Shame to our eyes?

What if we were to rail against abortion
And seek Justice against the murderers of beautiful European children
Thus filling this vastly resourced and under-populated world
With the inherent ingenuity of those who would save us?

What if God walks amongst us and cries for our loss?

What if we rekindled a Love for our own Kind, Kith and Kin
And fight for the restoration of our Independence as Free Nations
Detaching ourselves from the Demonic Burden of World Governance
Destroying with the shout of a billion voices the Tower Of Babylon?

What if God walks amongst us and gives Fire to our Invective?

What if we had the Courage to be the Freemen we were Destined to be
And raised our voices as of One
To vanquish the tirade of Mischievous Lies that pervert all Reason
And share the Truth amongst ourselves without either Fear or Favour?

What if God walks amongst us and helps us to free our minds?

What if we had stood against the Evil of Cain and the Ashkenazim
Against the profiteering wars instigated by the Snake of Judaism
That by cunning turned all that was the Gold and Silver of European Man
Into base metals derived from the alchemy of suffering and mass murder?

What if God walks amongst us and forgives us for our duplicity?

What if we brought to the Flames of Justice those who have conspired
To rob us of the Paradise that was Ours from the Beginning of Time
Avenging the Deceivers who led us unto the Edge of the Abyss
Forcing The Destroyers and Usurers to make recompense for their crimes?

What if God walks amongst us and embraces us as our attorney?

What if we were to open our eyes
To all the Hideous Falsehoods we were taught from the day we were born
Reminding our men-in-arms as to their real constitutional loyalties
Paying no observance to the mediated Mouth of Filth in our homes?

What if God walks amongst us and continues to tell us the Real News?

What if we were to expose Their Lies to those who have ears to hear
And pay not one more dime to the Pharisees
And withdraw our consent from the State
And declare Personal Secession?

What if God walks with us on the Path of Liberty?

What if you were to be the tinniest spanner in the works
For a million tiny spanners maketh an entire machine irreparable
Bringing the entire Demonic System to a grinding halt
Until it is called upon you to fight?

What if God fights alongside you as your Leader?

And what if God requires that you be your Own Leader
Then teach others to do the same unto themselves
So that Freedom from Tyranny will be yours
And your Children shall inherit the Earth?

What if?

Coffee with Bradley Smith of CODOH: Elie Wiesel, a ludicrously unreliable "eyewitness"

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

The Hebrew-Israelite-Canaanite Origins of Druidism & Norse, Teutonic, and Celtic paganism






Amazing insights in this article by Eli James of "Anglo-Saxon Israel".

And to be clear on the title of this post, of course the Old Testament religion of the Israelites was not "pagan." Rather, the pagan Teutonic and Celtic religions are a mixture of Canaanite paganism and Old Testament Hebrewism. How? Because the Celts, Saxons, and other Northern European tribes are the descendants of the Israelites...who were banished from the ancient land of Israel in Palestine because they adopted Canaanite paganism, which they then carried with them when they migrated into Europe.


Myth: European Paganism Is of Non-Hebrew Origin

Many White pagans assume that Teutonic and Celtic paganism are of non-Hebrew origin. This is not true. The fact is that the main reason that Yahweh banished the Israelites into the wilderness was because of their acquired taste for paganism. The Israelites of the Ten Northern Tribes, especially under Jezebel (a Sidonian Canaanite woman) and Ahab, were practicing all sorts of pagan rituals, including human sacrifice and frolicking (sex orgies) in the groves. Ah! The good old days!!! These practices were borrowed from the neighboring Canaanites; and the false gods they worshipped were actually Canaanite gods and goddesses. We will here proceed to document the Canaanite origin of Celtic and Teutonic paganism among the Aryan nations.

Hosea 4:15-17 trells us, “…come not ye unto Gilgal, neither go you up to Bethaven…For Israel slideth back as a backsliding heifer…Ephraim is joined to idols.”

Bethaven means “house of Aven.” The Phoenician Israelites, who travelled back and forth to Britain, mining tin and other metals and bringing them back to Palestine, named numerous places after the place of the god, Aven, such as Avebury, the Avon River(s) and the town of Avening.

“The worship of Beth-Aven, in Canaan, and that of Avening in Gloucestershire, and that of Aven, Heliopolis or Baal Bec, were all identical. The stone altars, the high place, the calves’ bones discovered there, mark the similarity.” - Samuel Lysons, Our British Ancestors, p. 123.

“But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your god, which ye made to yourselves, therefore will I cause you to go into captivity..” - Amos 5:26.

Moloch and Chiun were pagan gods adopted by the rebellious Israelites. Yahweh was getting very angry with His children. He was getting ready to cast them out into the wilderness of Europe.

“The Druids worshipped the sun under the title of Moloch, so we are certain that worship was derived from their Eastern ancestors.” – Dr. Thomas Maurice, Indian Antiquities, 1796.

Who were the Druids? The Druids were Levitical priests who abandoned Yahweh and officiated at the pagan rites of the rebellious Israelites! Their costumes matched the uniforms of the Israelite priests, down to the tiniest detail!

“The Irish Druids worshipped under sacred oaks, as the Israelites did. The Druids had a great veneration for the oak. The last act of Joshua was to place a great stone under an oak in the sanctuary…The Druids were considered to be a holy people, a nation of priests, common to all the tribes of Britain. Their duties, characteristics and dress were strikingly in consonance with those of the Levitical priesthood.” – Hugh B. Colquhoun, Our Descent From Israel Proved by Cumulative Evidence, p, 20.

‘Druid’ is the Celtic word for “oak.” The Druids were the high priests of the oak fraternity.

Chiun was a goddess of the Canaanites, and the Israelites began to worship her as well.

“The children gather wood, and the fathers kindle the fire, and the women knead their dough, to make cakes to the Queen of Heaven and to pour out drink offerings unto other gods…” – Hosea 1:18.

It is quite likely that the name Chiun is the Hebrew source for the surname Quinn and the English word Queen.

The Teutonic god, Odin, or Wotan, is actually the Scythian German King Odin, the warrior chief who organized the Teutons into a fighting force that defeated the Romans. He was a real descendant of the Israelites, not a god. Odin is also a word very similar to a Hebrew word for lord, Adon (Greek Adonis).

According to Sharon Turner in his monumental work The History of the Anglo-Saxons, citing the ancient Saxon Chronicles, the famous Odin actually lived in the 3rd century AD, and many of the kings of England, Germany and Scandinavia traced their descent from him. We have a tendency to make “stars” out of our heroes. The word Teut is an anglicized version of the German Deutsch, which is derived from the Latin (Roman) Deus, meaning “god.” The word Deutschevolk, therefore, means “God’s people.” This is exactly how the Israelites referred to themselves. No other people in history referred to themselves as God’s people, except the Israelites. All of the Celts and Saxons retained some form of this expression. The word British, in Hebrew, means “Covenant Man.” Brit is Hebrew for Covenant and Ish is Hebrew for “man.” The Saxon Goth and the German Gott both mean “God.” Gottish, therefore, means “God’s People.”

The Celtic Bel is identical to the Hebrew Baal; and the Beltrane feast is still celebrated in parts of Britain today. None of these people have any idea that they are practicing traditions brought to Europe by their pagan Israelite ancestors!

The Hebrew word, Al, meaning the sun, became the Phoenician Hal. In Celtic, it becomes Heaul; and in Greek it was Helios.

“All Celtic nations have been accustomed to the worship of the sun…It was a custom that everywhere prevailed in ancient times to celebrate a feast at the winter solstice…They called it, in many places, Yole or Yuul, from the word Hiaul.” - Professor Paul-Henri Mallett, Northern Antiquities, Vol. 2, p 68.

Now you know the origin of the word ‘Yule,” for Christmas, and why Christmas is celebrated right near the solstice, when all evidence suggests that Yahshua was born in late September.

The Catholic Church has been most guilty of blending paganism with Christianity, as Easter is really a hybrid pagan rite, derived from the worship of the Babylonian goddess, Ishtar. Ishtar was the goddess of fertility. Have you ever wondered what the Easter bunny has to do with the Crucifixion? The short answer is: “Nothing!”

Mary-worship can be traced back to Semiramis of Babylon. Statues of Semiramis show her as the prototypical “Madonna and child.” So, Christmas, Easter and the Madonna motif all contain pagan elements directly traceable to ancient Babylon.

Neo-pagans believe that the word, Saxon, derives from the word Axe. How the letter S was added to the word axe is obscure. What we know for sure is that Yahweh told Abraham that his offspring would be named after his son, Isaac. “In Isaac shall they seed be called.” – Gen. 21:12. Note that the Jewish people are NOT named after Isaac. Saxons = Isaac’s sons. Even if the word Saxon is derivable from the word, axe, it is still an Israelite connection, for in Jeremiah 51:20, Yahweh tells His people, Israel, “Thou art my BATTLE-AXE.” The Israelites were famous for their use of the battle-axe in war. Their descendants, the Scythians and Anglo-Saxons, were also famous for the use of this weapon. Yet it is evident, that the Scythian tribes who migrated into Europe were called Khumri by the Assyrians, hence the Greek Kimmeroi; and they were called Saka by the Persians, hence the Greek Sakae or Sakans, later Saxons. These names are well documented in the Greek classics and in the multilingual inscriptions of Mesopotamia.

In addition to telling us that we would be exiled for our pagan rebellion, Yahweh also told us that we would be known by another name. (Isaiah 62:2; 65:15.) “Caucasian” is the best bet, but Anglo-Saxon and Christian would also qualify as new names for His Israelite people. Many other similarities exist in the Germanic and Hebrew belief systems, such as an existence in an afterlife, heaven and hell (Valhalla and Niflheim) etc. {Niflheim bears an uncanny resemblance to the Hebrew word Nephilim, meaning the offspring of the fallen angels and the daughters of Adamite women, in Genesis 6.}

We are only scratching the surface of this subject. The Canaanite origin of the Celtic/Teutonic pantheon can be demonstrated in volumes of historical and linguistic connections. There is so much evidence of this fact that it is quite irrefutable. But, of course, few Whites or Christians are aware of the Israelites’ descent into paganism. It’s a forgotten chapter of the Bible. Neo-Pagans of today have no idea that they are actually worshipping the gods of the Canaanites, who were the true ancestors of today’s Jews.

So, who’s REALLY practicing a form of Judaism – Christian Identity or Neo-Pagans?

How’s them apples? – Or should we say, Acorns?




Related Articles:

- On the migrations of the tribes of Israel into Europe, and the similarities of Norse mythology to the Old Testament and Babylonian religion
- The Hebrew-Israelite Origins of Europe: Sea-faring Israelites fleeing the Assyrians in 8th century B.C. fled to Greece, Europe, and British Isles
- English and other Germanic Languages, as well as Greek, Latin and Runic, Have Their Origin in Hebrew
- The Mystery of the True Descendants of the Israelites - The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and Kindred Peoples

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

Yitzchak Ganon's hoaxacaust tale - Kidney removed without anaesthetic at Auschwitz, last seen "pulsating in the hand of Dr. Mengele"





Yitzhak Ganon


After Mengele cut out his kidney with no anaesthetic, Yitzhak screamed and begged for death to stop the suffering.

Mengele then sent him back to work without painkillers.

Also, poor Yitzhak had to spend the whole night in a bath of ice-cold water because Mengele wanted to "test" his lung function. Jews are immune to hypothermia.

Altogether, Ganon says he spent six and a half months being nursed back to health in the hospital...at the Auschwitz "death camp."

He says his mother and five siblings were sent to the gas chambers.

Yitzhak was later slated to go to the gas chambers, but was the 201st man and the gas chamber was full after 200. A miracle!



Article: "Why One Auschwitz Survivor Avoided Doctors for 65 Years"




Note: use http://www.archive.org/ to find article if original link no longer works





More Preposterous Holohoax Tales