Saturday, January 31, 2009

Staged Economic Crisis Used to Fast-track Iceland into the European Union


The Greatest Maritime Disaster in History - The Sinking of the Wilhem Gustloff - more than 7,000 Germans, mostly civilians, lost

The Sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff

Dr. William Pierce
February 14, 1998

What's said to be the most expensive motion picture ever made was released a few weeks ago and has been earning record money at the box office. The film, of course, is Titanic, and it's about the sinking of the ocean liner RMS Titanic on April 15, 1912, with the loss of 1,513 lives, after the ship struck an iceberg in the North Atlantic. There are many superlatives in the film. The Titanic was the largest ship ever built at the time. It also was the most luxurious ship, intended to provide high-speed trans-Atlantic transportation in comfort for the rich and pampered. The implication of the film is that the sinking of the Titanic was the greatest maritime disaster of all time. I'm sure that the great majority of the American public believes that to be the case, but it isn't. Everyone has heard about the sinking of the Titanic, and very few have heard about the sinking of the S.S. Wilhelm Gustloff, which was the greatest maritime disaster.

It is easy to understand why everyone has heard about the Titanic: it was a very big, very expensive ship, claimed to be virtually "unsinkable," which went down on its maiden voyage with a record number of celebrities and tycoons aboard. The irony of the sinking helped generate public interest and an enormous media coverage. When the Wilhelm Gustloff went down, on the other hand, with the loss of more than 6,000 lives, the controlled media adopted the deliberate policy that it was a non-event, not to be commented on or even reported. The Wilhelm Gustloff, like the Titanic, was a big passenger liner and was reasonably new and luxurious. But it was a German passenger liner. It was sunk in the Baltic Sea on the night of January 30, 1945, by a Soviet submarine. It was packed with nearly 8,000 Germans, most of them women and children escaping from the advancing Soviet Army.

Many of these German refugees lived in East Prussia, a part of Germany that the Communist and democratic Allies had agreed would be taken from Germany and given to the Soviet Union at the end of the Second World War. Others lived in Danzig and the surrounding area, which the democrats and Communists had decided would be taken from Germany and given to Poland. All of these refugees were fleeing in terror from the Reds, who already had demonstrated in East Prussia what was in store for any German unfortunate enough to fall into their hands.

As Soviet military units overtook columns of German civilian refugees fleeing to the west, they behaved in a way which has not been seen in Europe since the Mongol invasions of the Middle Ages. Often the men, most of them farmers or Germans who had been engaged in other essential occupations and thus exempted from military service, were simply murdered on the spot. The women were, almost without exception, gang-raped. This was the fate of girls as young as eight years old and old women in their eighties, as well as women in the advanced stages of pregnancy. Women who resisted rape had their throats cut or were shot. Very often women were murdered after being gang-raped. Many women and girls were raped so often and so brutally that they died from this abuse alone.

Sometimes Soviet tank columns simply rolled right over the fleeing refugees, grinding them into the mud with their tank treads. When Soviet Army units occupied East Prussian villages, they engaged in orgies of torture, rape, and murder so bestial that they cannot be described fully on this program. Sometimes they castrated the men and boys before killing them. Sometimes they gouged their eyes out. Sometimes they burned them alive. Some women after being gang-raped were crucified by being nailed to barn doors while still alive and then used for target practice.

This atrocious behavior on the part of the Communist troops was due in part to the nature of the Communist system, which had succeeded in overthrowing Russian society and the Russian government in the first place by organizing the scum of Russian society -- the losers and ne'er-do-wells, the criminals, the resentful and the envious -- under the Jews and setting them against the successful, the accomplished, the refined, and the prosperous, promising the rabble that if they pulled down their betters then they could take the place of the latter: the first shall be last, and the last shall be first.

It was the members of this rabble, this scum of Russian society, who became the bosses of local soviets and collectives and workers' councils -- when the positions had not already been taken by Jews. The Soviet soldiers of 1945 had grown up under this system of rule by the worst; for 25 years they had lived under commissars chosen from the dregs of Russian society. Any tendency toward nobility or gentility had been weeded out ruthlessly. Stalin had ordered the butchering of 35,000 Red Army officers, half of the old Russian officers' corps, in 1937, just two years before the war, because he did not trust gentlemen. The officers who replaced those shot in the 1937 purge were not much more civilized in their behavior than the commissars.

An even more specific and immediate cause of the atrocities committed against the German population of East Prussia was the Soviet hate propaganda which deliberately incited the Soviet troops to rape and murder -- even to murder German infants. The chief of the Soviet propaganda commissars was a hate-filled Jew named Ilya Ehrenburg. One of his directives to the Soviet troops read:

Kill! Kill! In the German race there is nothing but evil; not one among the living, not one among the yet unborn but is evil! Follow the precepts of Comrade Stalin. Stamp out the fascist beast once and for all in its lair! Use force and break the racial pride of these Germanic women. Take them as your lawful booty. Kill! As you storm onward, kill, you gallant soldiers of the Red Army.

Not every Russian soldier was a butcher or a rapist, of course: just most of them. A few of them still had a sense of morality and decency which even Jewish Communism had not destroyed. Alexander Solzhenitsyn was one of these. He was a young captain in the Red Army when it entered East Prussia in January 1945. He wrote later in his Gulag Archipelago: "All of us knew very well that if the girls were German they could be raped and then shot. This was almost a combat distinction."

In one of his poems, Prussian Nights, he describes a scene he witnessed in a house in the East Prussian town of Neidenburg:

Twenty-two Hoeringstrasse.
It's not been burned, just looted, rifled.
A moaning by the walls, half muffled:
The mother's wounded, half alive.
The little daughter's on the mattress,
Dead. How many have been on it?
A platoon? A company perhaps?
A girl's been turned into a woman,
A woman turned into a corpse ...
The mother begs, 'Soldier, kill me!'

And so, German civilians were fleeing in terror from East Prussia, and for many of them the only route of escape was across the icy Baltic Sea. They packed the port of Gotenhafen, near Danzig, hoping to find passage to the west. Hitler ordered all available civilian ships into the rescue effort. The Wilhelm Gustloff was one of these. A 25,000-ton passenger liner, it had been used before the war by the "Strength through Joy" organization to take German workers on low-cost vacation excursions. On January 30, 1945, when it steamed out of Gotenhafen it carried a crew of just under 1,100 officers and men, 73 critically wounded soldiers, 373 young women of the Women's Naval Auxiliary, equivalent to our WAVES, and more than 6,000 desperate refugees, most of them women and children.

Soviet submarines and aircraft were a constant menace to this rescue effort. They regarded the refugee ships in the light of Ehrenburg's genocidal propaganda: the more Germans they could kill the better, and it didn't make any difference to them whether their victims were soldiers or women and children. At just after 9:00 PM, when the Wilhelm Gustloff was 13 miles off the coast of Pomerania, three torpedoes from the Soviet submarine S-13, under the command of Captain A.I. Marinesko, struck the ship. Ninety minutes later it sank beneath the icy waves of the Baltic. Although a heroic effort to pick up survivors was made by other German ships, barely 1,100 were saved. The rest, more than 7,000 Germans, died in the frigid water that night.

A few days later, on February 10, 1945, the same Soviet submarine sank the German hospital ship, the General von Steuben, and 3,500 wounded soldiers aboard the ship, who were being evacuated from East Prussia, drowned. To the Soviets, inflamed by Jewish hate propaganda, the sign of the Red Cross meant nothing. On May 6, 1945, the German freighter Goya, also part of the rescue fleet, was torpedoed by another Soviet submarine, and more than 6,000 refugees fleeing from East Prussia died.

The lack of knowledge in the United States about any of these terrible maritime disasters of 1945 is profound, even among people who consider themselves knowledgeable on naval matters. And this ignorance stems from the deliberate policy of the controlled media, a policy which has relegated these disasters to the category of non-events. The reason for this media policy originally was the same reason which led the Jewish media bosses to blame the slaughter of 15,000 Polish officers and intellectuals in the Katyn woods in 1940 on the Germans. They knew that the Soviets had done it, as part of their effort to "proletarianize" Poland and make the Poles more amenable to Communist rule, but they didn't want to tarnish the image of our "gallant Soviet ally," as the Reds were called by the controlled U.S. media during the war. They wanted Americans to think that the Germans were the bad guys and the Soviets were the good guys, so they simply lied about the Katyn massacre.

Likewise, even in the last months of the war, they didn't want Americans alerted to the fact that our "gallant Soviet ally" was butchering and raping the civilian population of East Prussia and deliberately sinking the civilian refugee ships which were helping the East Prussians escape across the Baltic Sea. That might damage America's enthusiasm for continuing the destruction of Germany with the help of our "gallant Soviet ally." So the controlled media simply didn't report these things.

After the triumph of the democratic and Communist Allies and the unconditional surrender of Germany this reason no longer was valid, of course. But by then another motive had taken its place. The Jews were beginning to build their "Holocaust" story and were demanding sympathy from the world -- and reparations money from anyone they could get it from. As they began wailing about the supposed extermination of six million of their kinsmen in "gas ovens" by the wicked Germans and portraying themselves as the innocent and inoffensive victims of the greatest crime in history, they didn't want any facts getting in the way -- and they certainly didn't want Americans to see both sides of the conflict; they didn't want the Germans seen as victims too. All Germans were evil, just like Comrade Ehrenburg had said; all Jews were good; and that was it. The Jews suffered, and the Germans didn't, and so now the world owed the Jews a living for not stopping the "Holocaust."

It really wouldn't help their "Holocaust" propaganda at all to have the American public learn about what had happened in East Prussia or in the Baltic Sea -- or to learn that our "gallant Soviet ally" had deliberately murdered the leadership stratum of the Polish nation in the Katyn woods, and that some of the murderers involved in that horrendous act were Jews. And so there has been a conspiracy of silence in America on the part of the Jewish media bosses.

That's why Hollywood was willing to spend $200 million producing the film Titanic but would never consider any film dealing with the sinking of the Wilhelm Gustloff. It's not that such a film couldn't make money -- I think that a film about East Prussia and the Wilhelm Gustloff could be a real blockbuster -- it's that there must be no sympathy for the Germans. There must be no rethinking of America's reasons for waging war against Germany, no questioning of whether or not we did the right thing in allying ourselves with Communism on behalf of the Jews. And beside these considerations, the truth simply doesn't count -- at least, not to the Jews who control our mass media.

This bit of history -- America's motivations for engaging in the war in Europe, which really was something altogether separate from the war in the Pacific, despite the alliance between Germany and Japan -- this bit of history always has fascinated me. And one of the interesting aspects about it is the unwillingness of so many Americans to examine it. I understand the sentiments of the Clintonista elements. To the kind of people who voted for Clinton, the Soviets were the good guys and the Germans were the bad guys on ideological grounds. Gang-rape, mass murder, and the sinking of refugee ships are not really crimes in the eyes of the Bill-and-Hillary types when they're done by Communists against "Nazis."

But there also were a lot of decent Americans who fought in the war in Europe, anti-Communist Americans, and many of them don't want to think about the fact that they fought on the wrong side. These American Legion and VFW types don't want to hear about who really killed all of those Polish intellectuals and leaders in the Katyn woods. They don't want to know what happened in East Prussia in 1945. They hate it when I ask them, why did we fight Germany in the name of freedom and then turn half of Europe over to Communist slavery at the end of the war?

I was far too young for military service in the Second World War, but I am sure that if I had fought in that war, I'd be even more interested in understanding what was behind it. I believe that knowing the truth about these things is far more important than protecting our carefully nurtured belief that we were on the side of righteousness. I believe that understanding how we were deceived in the past is necessary, if we are to avoid being deceived in the future.

Friday, January 23, 2009

"Revolutionary Majorities"

Excellent lesson and insight into the real history behind the American Revolution, and how to apply those strategies for the overthrow of the current tyranny.

"Revolutionary Majorities" -- Part One

An Essay by Louis Beam

If citizens of this country ever again enjoy the blessings of liberty and true freedom, it will not be the result of a majority of its citizens having risen up in righteous indignation at governmental abuse of themselves and their culture. If a restoration of the Constitution of our forbearers occurs - with all that this implies - it will probably not be because a plurality of citizens fought for it, supported it, or cared one way or another. If lawful government is reestablished it will come about because a revolutionary majority makes it happen.

Within the American historical experience a revolutionary majority may be defined as any number of citizens sufficient to initiate general hostilities against a destructive government.

The American Revolution of 1776 defines the term, sets the precedent and provides the example for patriots of today.

Throughout most of the Revolutionary War, those patriots who were seeking to overthrow the government lacked support of over two-thirds of their fellow citizens. John Adams, one of the "radicals" in favor of the Revolution and who was later to become the second President of the United States, stated that depending on how the war was going, those fighting for freedom had the opposition of from a third to two thirds of the people. Others like Pennsylvania delegate to the Continental Congress Joseph Galloway was sure that four-fifths of the people "were or wanted to be, loyal to the King." (Galloway eventually sided with the Loyalists, as those who supported the King's government were called.) Colonel London Carter, a member of the Virginia aristocracy and a strong patriot, stated in his diary in March of 1776 (but a bare three months before the signing of the Declaration of Independence) that an observer of events in the Northern colonies was sure "nine-tenths of the people are violently against it" (independence).

The exact number of "the friends of government", as the patriots disparagingly referred to those who opposed the Revolution, cannot be stated with accuracy. As John Adams indicated, the number was in a constant state of flux, depending on political events and who was winning in the armed conflict. One thing is certain, however; the American Revolution was anything but a broad-based popular uprising of a disaffected people. Rather, it was a very unpopular rebellion of a politically radical minority who, because they possessed a clear understanding of the rights of man coupled with a deep concern for the state of relative personal freedom, were able to perceive the shackles of tyranny prior to their being presented for fastening. This discernment of tyranny at a distance not only set them apart from their fellow man but constrained them to rebel.

The radical political leaders of the Revolution such as John Adams, Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Richard Henry Lee, John Hancock, and Joseph Warren, to name but a few of the more well known, had to conduct their struggle for freedom in the face of disapprobation and rejection by their peers before the time of actual armed conflict, and after its commencement to charges and cries of "incendiaries and traitors." Indeed "the friends of government" knew little restraint when it came to condemning the Republic's Founders. The Loyalists called Washington, among other things; a liar, perjurer, murderer, blasphemer, criminal, traitor, patron of villainy, and a villain's chief. The other Founders fared little better and were variously referred to as being dregs, illiberal (sic!) and violent men, despicable wretches, bandits, rude, and depraved. While thus labeled by "respectable citizens," these men led the country toward rebellion.

Correspondingly, the Founders had an analogous movement among the common people which, although the objective of overthrowing the government was the same, the methods were those resorted to by people in every age when faced with overpowering force of all-powerful government, namely, mob action, riots, uprisings, midnight forays, and harassment, intimidation, or terroristic acts directed against governmental supporters. All of these and other acts came under the single heading of patriotism so far as their perpetrators were concerned.

After a review of non-battlefield hostilities, it becomes apparent that the American Revolution was won more by mob action than by armed conflict! Thus, any idea that the Revolution was won in an ordeal of battle is out of place in view of the facts.

During the entire length of the armed conflict from 1775 to 1781, the King's armies lost only 1,512 men killed in battle; this seven-year, battle-death casualty rate was exceeded by Union forces at Cold Harbor in 1864 during the first eight minutes of a single engagement. The King's armies had previously lost far larger numbers of men in the Seven Years War (French and Indian Wars) yet pressed on to victory. An adequate explanation then of the patriots' final triumph over the government must be provided by other than a military victory.

An answer, in great part, lies in the violence and vigilante action carried on by the patriots against the government and its supporters! Though most Americans today are familiar with the Boston Tea Party, few know much about the secret organization that conducted it, the Sons of Liberty. Led by Samuel Adams, John Hancock, Dr. Warren ("the greatest incendiary of them all"), and Paul Revere, they met in secret, dressed in disguises, and carried out vigilante actions under the cover of darkness. This revolutionary Ku Klux Klan was as much dreaded by "the friends of government" as its ideological offspring, the Klan, ever was by unruly Blacks. The Sons of Liberty and other similar groups were responsible, during the course of the conflict for independence, for causing tens of thousands of Loyalist to flee the country (the Klan was usually satisfied with merely running undesirables out of the county).

The means were simple and effective. Terror and intimidation were directed against the Loyalists. Methods used to create these twin scourges of "the friends of government" included, but were not limited to, whippings, coats of tar and feathers, banishment, church burnings (if run by a Loyalist preacher or used for a Loyalist meeting place), confiscation of property, and wherever deemed necessary - death of any one of several reliable methods.

Other patriotic groups formed throughout the thirteen colonies to carry on a relentless persecution of "the friends of government." Each organization operated independently of the other though often exchanged information on Loyalists.


Full Essay

Austrian 'far-right' legislator convicted of incitement for anti-Muslim statements


Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Happy Belated Robert E. Lee Day!

source: Access St. Louis

As the rest of the country celebrates the birthday of a racemixing, plagiarizing, communist jew tool agitator who was without honor, we who wish to separate honor the memory of a real man. Robert Edward Lee, Soldier, Educator, Christian Gentleman, was born on this date in 1807. Robert E. Lee is an example for us all because when it came time to choose between his Government and his blood kin, he did the honorable thing and chose the latter. This is the question that faces all Patriots this day. What will you choose?

Monday, January 19, 2009

Holocaust by hunger: The truth behind Stalin's Great Famine


Jews celebrate genocide of white English - One in 10 children in Britain now of mixed race


Michael King aka "Martin Luther King, Jr"- Jewish Puppet, Communist Agent, Plagiarist, Charlatan, Degenerate Homosexual and Whoremonger

The Jews' Media and Jewish Establishment sickeningly worships this so-called "doctor" and "reverend" Negro year-round, and holds him out as some kind of "saint" of the highest order. You can hardly find a city or even reasonably large town in the United States that does not have a street named after him. The truth is he was a complete fraud, moral degenerate, and Marxist puppet -- much like Communist and rabid anti-white terrorist Nelson Mandela, and our current favorite magic Negro Barack Obama...creations and tools of the ruling Jewish Establishment used to push the Judeo-Marxist race-mixing and anti-white agenda.

"The Beast as Saint:The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr."

Thursday, January 15, 2009

Patrick Grimm: 'The Enemies Within'

Full article re-produced below:

The Enemies Within

By Patrick Grimm
Thursday, May 24, 2007

Big Jewry seeks to steal, kill and destroy in the same exact way that the Bible tells us that the Evil One intends to do these things. Big Jewry is armed with a bankroll rivaling the Almighty. They intend your (the European-Americans) demise as a people. These are the "enemies within" our nation that Marcus Tullius Cicero, the great Roman orator warned us of so many centuries ago. His famous quote deserves repeating here:

"A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears no traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victim, and he wears their face and their garments and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared. The traitor is the plague." [1]

We are plagued by Big Jewry, its minions, its media, its confidence men among the Goyim and all its unspeakable iniquitous works. Illegal immigration is only the tip of an ominous iceberg of titanic proportions. Nearly 99% of all the societal sicknesses you see being foisted upon us are being delivered (with postage due) courtesy of one unified whole. It's not necessarily the Jewish people as a group who are wholly to blame, though one wishes that the decent among them would speak out against their leadership, but it is Big Jewry we have to fear. It is the kosher grand wizards of international Zionism who are funding this horde invasion of a formerly majority white nation.

It is my job, my duty and indeed my pleasure to inform you of these facts. I won't shut up about any of this until every American fully grasps what is at stake and who is tightening the screws on our people. Big Jewry has emboldened every perversion in the United States, they have caused most of the world to hate America, not because America is still so good, but because America is becoming more Jewish in the way it operates. We are shipping our vile, base and appalling entertainment all over the globe and we wonder why the Muslims hate and despise us. We wonder why they aren't impressed and why many of them will do anything to hurt us. Moral people in European countries are also shocked and repulsed by what is flowing like sewage from a spigot out of Hollywood and into their homes.

America is now a Judeocracy and what that means for us is endless war for endless empire, not a monocultural nation, but a multicultural one, and every kind of degradation and degeneracy known to man. We are thoroughly Judaized, in our thoughts, our attitudes and our permissiveness and moral relativism. Can this honestly be disputed anymore? I don't believe it can be. Looking at America from a certain angle, a space alien visiting our country could say "They are all Jews!" Aren't we? We have turned from God to materialism and the pursuit of money and pleasure. These are Talmudic precepts and they are killing us. We have transformed into Mammonites, literal worshippers of mammon, that, not coincidentally has almost become worthless thanks to our Federal Reserve.

I don't want to be a Jewish country anymore. I want to be an American country again, the one our wildly idealistic Founding Fathers envisioned and the one Ronald Reagan hoped for when he spoke of a "shining city on a hill" invoking the history of the Puritans and their belief in divine Providence. The United States of America was respected and looked up to once. Can it happen again? I don't know, but what I do know is that the Jewishness of this nation-state is the worst part of it, the part that the world's peoples loathe. We must reclaim what we once were. That means getting the beast of Zionism and Big Jewry off our backs. It means standing, fighting and declaring openly and proudly that we will be controlled, manhandled, brainwashed and cajoled no longer, least of all by a sick alien force that has no allegiance but profit, perfidy and the power of the purse.

Jewess Hillary Clinton: "climate change threatens our very existence", global action needed at Dec. 2009 UN conference in Copenhagen


Wednesday, January 14, 2009



by Val Koinen
January 13, 2009


We White Americans are rapidly being dispossessed in this, the country our ancestors founded, pioneered, and built. More than dispossessed -- we are being “genocided” out of existence. Our literal survival as a human (sub)species is in peril.

And the situation is even worse for White men. They, during the course of that dispossession, and thanks primarily to the media-controlling Jews and other aspects of organized Jewry, are being culturally emasculated -- rendered irrelevant socially, politically, and even biologically (as appropriate mates for their White women).

Oh, sure, young White men still chase the girls, and thanks to some extent to the girls’ lax morals, also due in large part to Jewish media efforts; there is plenty of sex. But instead of getting married and fathering and supporting White babies in a wholesome family environment; all too many young White men spend most of their free hours (when not pursuing and having casual sex) doing “weed” and other drugs, wearing backward baseball caps and baggy pants, listening to “rap,” worshipping Negro sports figures, and being loud and obnoxious sports “fans” (in the true spirit of the word’s derivation from “fanatic”) while sitting in a “sports bar” or on the living room couch, swilling their beers. And that is no way for men to propagate a civilization or to hold that civilization and its underlying culture together.

Make no mistake -- our situation is deadly serious -- we are in dire straits, and things are getting worse by the day. Much worse, in a rapid and accelerating manner. It’s a “clear and present danger” if there ever was one.


read the rest

Parents who named son "Adolf Hitler" have their 3 children taken away by goons of jewish-occupied government of New Jersey

Clockwise from left, Adolf Hitler Campbell, Heath and Deborah Campbell holding Adolf Hitler and Heath holding JoyceLynn Aryan Nation Campbell.


Tuesday, January 13, 2009

The "Holocaust" Debunked

This speech was presented in July of 1995. In it, Mark Weber, Director of The Institute for Historical Review, sites facts which debunk the "holocaust" myth.

Introduction to the Holocaust™ Hoax

In Defense of White Supremacy - 1) It's simply an objective fact, and 2) Whites should owe allegiance to their own people above all others

What is ‘White Supremacism’? Why is it bad?

Typically, whenever anyone advocates any policy that remotely favors whites, he will be assailed with the usual cacophony of ‘racist,’ ‘white supremacist,’ ‘hater,’ ‘neo-nazi,’ etc. Many people insist they are not white supremacists, not racists, not haters, they just want ‘x.’ As the argument goes, “x” isn’t racist, it’s just common sense. Or “X” isn’t hateful, it’s just benevolent towards our own. Or “X” isn’t white supremacy, it’s just nationalism, separatism, realism, etc, etc.

Various groups are giving strange dichotomies like ‘it’s okay to be proud of your race, so long as you aren’t a white supremacist.’ ‘it’s okay to oppose immigration, so long as you aren’t a white supremacist.’ Etc. Most of the right wing groups, in a desperate wish for respectability, play by the liberals’ rules and truckle under their demands. We’ll be ‘only so far to the right and no further.’ And in order to prove their true PC credentials, they will sharply vilify and attack anyone to the right of them, to show the leftie liberals that they’re really good people, that they’re basically on the same side, and they hate the evil white supremacist nazis too. This moral cowardice infects even the ‘hardest core’ which turns out to be quite spinelessly soft in the end.

Let’s call a spade a spade. There are two definitions of white supremacy that make any sense, the objective and the subjective. I’ll explain each of them, and if you don’t fall under either category, if you are not a white supremacist in either sense, you should have no interest in being anything else either. Instead of disavowing white supremacism while clinging to white separatist, white nationalist, survivalist, etc, you should just give it up and go back to being a good communist left-winger. Nothing is more pathetic than people who refuse to maintain a principled and orderly moral system but contort themselves into loops and pretzels of contradictory views. Basically, you’re just a chink in our moral armor, a weak point liberals can chisel away at, dividing us amongst ourselves, causing friction and ultimately dissension and surrender in the ranks. Once you’ve admitted it’s immoral to be a white supremacist, everything else is immoral too, and it’s time to file for extinction. That’s the only other path that lays before us. People must choose.

Definition 1, the Objective White Supremacism: The belief that whites are objectively superior beings, that by any fair measure, they come out ‘supreme.’ That whites are the best. That we are the best race and have the credentials to prove it.

Is this true or false? First of course we must decide on what objective measures we will be using, to decide if we are superior or inferior. Let’s look at some simple ones then. Standard of Living. Whites have the highest standard of living in the world, we are indeed supreme at affording ourselves the very best lifestyle. Roll out a map of the world, color it in with ‘wealth, freedom, longevity, lack of corruption’ or any other objective measure, and white countries will come out the highest. Perhaps a few asian countries like taiwan, south korea, singapore, japan will join in, but the map of the world will be colored distinctly ‘white good, non-white bad.’

Human Accomplishment is another objective measure we could use. Let’s go back through history and color the map of the world based on who did what. Again, you’ll get a few scattered good things in japan, china, or wherever---and then a massive, dense, overwhelming scatterplot of white countries accomplishing virtually everything. Art, music, literature, math, science, technology, whatever you want, you will find it absolutely dominated by whites. Again, whites are supreme in their ability to accomplish, they take the cake by far. Read Charles Murray’s Human Accomplishment if there’s any further doubt of this objective fact. ‘white good, non-white bad.’

It is a fact that even non-whites prefer the looks of white women. Every other race attempts to lighten their skin complexion so they can look more like the human ideal, whites, even with dangerous toxins and bleaches that leave them looking ridiculous. Not just now, but across all time, not just blacks, but asians too. India has an entire caste system based around varna, or color, where the lighter skinned castes are respected more than the darker. The same is true in china, where parasols were used to keep the skin from tanning and skin lighteners used to chemically alter their basic skin color. We did not introduce that, they chose it on their own thousands of years ago. The objective superiority of our white women draws the lust of all the non-whites and makes them the constant victim of rape. White on non-white rape, however, is virtually non-existent. Why would a white want them? The difference is so vast, that while blacks rape 37,000 white women in America a year, not a single white on black rape occurred. Every single attempt the media has made to find a white on black rape has been discovered to be a hoax. The beauty of white women is supreme. Modeling magazines continuously find that white women sell, non-white women don’t, even in the non-white world. Commercials, billboards, and marriage online dating services, all feature lighter-skinned women even within their own race than their average skin tone. Young black children prefer playing with white dolls over black dolls, because they look better. White children, of course, are instinctively averse to non-white dolls, and when they grow up, refuse to miscegenate on the whole, at a vastly higher rate than non-whites who would love nothing better than to find a white woman. ‘white good, non-white bad.’

What about our physical, martial, and athletic prowess? Again, whites are supreme. The vast majority of the Summer and Winter Olympic Medalists are white, even though we are only 8% of the world population. This is just a hands down victory for the physical superiority of whites. Include any other sports, as many extra sports as you please, we would still come out on top. Whether it’s our teamwork, intelligence, strength, tenacity, or skill, somehow whites come out on top objectively, beyond all debate, so that’s that. What about war? On the battlefield, whites are again utterly dominant. Whites have rarely lost a war to non-whites, not in the long run, and we have with ridiculously small numbers routed non-white armies over and over again. The boxer rebellion, for instance, was put down handily by a handful of whites (and japanese). The mongols conquered china easily but lost to the not even united Europe (and to japan.) India was conquered by a handful of british troops against giant Indian armies. The same is true in africa, and the conquistadores against the Incas and Aztecs accomplished similar marvels. The exchange rate between the USA and Japan, almost 10 to 1, showed again white superiority over even the best of the non-whites. And while the Roman Empire and the Greeks defeated Persia over and over again and took over much of the middle east, no Persians, Arabs, or middle easterners ever conquered Europe. The Ottomans gave the best shot and even they couldn’t beat a dis-united Europe with various countries all still squabbling among themselves. Europe paid so little attention to these non-white aggressors that they still spent all their time fighting each other---and STILL won. If one could ever imagine a ‘white army’ fighting as one against the non-white world, can anyone imagine anything but a smashing victory? Remember a few white texans took out the vastly larger mexican army, and the US-Mexico war was another easy victory for whites, that the boers at blood river defeated endless hordes of spear-chuckers, and that the US (or even the early settlers and pilgrims) traditionally defeated amerindians no matter what the odds over and over in our expansion westward. When it comes to the most basic measure of fitness, war and violent conflict, whites are supreme. It’s undebatable. We win, they lose, we are the best warriors of all time. ‘white good, non-white bad.’

So what is the use of not calling a spade a spade? The supreme race, the race that comes out on top in any competition, any measure of human fitness, any quality we respect, is the white race. We are the wealthiest, strongest, most accomplished, most beautiful race on earth. Objectively. Undeniably. Therefore anyone who even looks at the facts, anyone white or not, must through sheer logic and rationality, be a white supremacist. Whites are supreme, and therefore, anyone who acknowledges this fact, must be a white supremacist, by simple definition. Anyone who validates reality or cares about the truth, is a white supremacist, whether white or not, they must admit the superiority of the white race, as a whole, over any other. It is so impossible not to be a white supremacist, that only burying your head in the sand and intentionally looking for any little flaw in whites while exaggerating every good in non-whites, can remotely make the competition even. Only self-hating liberals are not white supremacists, there’s only two choices. To say that whites are the best in every field, but aren’t the supreme race, is just semantics. It’s moral cowardice.

Definition Two, Subjective White Supremacism: The belief that whites, regardless of merit or cause, hold your supreme, over-arching loyalty. That the white race has a supreme place in your heart. That is trumps the other races, for you, simply because you choose for it to. Subjective White Supremacism would not be fazed by meeting aliens from outer space who are better in every way than us. Even so, we would proclaim, my duty, love, and loyalty are to my people, not yours, and I will live and die for them, not you. Rather than mercenary bean counting, rather than switching your loyalty to whoever meets some arcane criteria in your head, a simple, straightforward subjective white supremacy needs no rationale, no arguments, no proof at all. It just needs a willing heart.

Subjective white supremacy is the counterpart to subjective racial solidarity among any other group. Saying your supreme interest, your supreme value, is the white race, is no different than Michelle Obama dedicating herself to the black race and its interests and valuing it above all others. It is no different from any other group forming an ‘asian blah blah’ or ‘jewish blah blah’ or ‘black blah blah’ or ‘hispanic blah blah.’ It’s an intentional effort to hold the interests of your group above all others, or loyalty to the in-group above the common or universal, of the supreme claim your race has on you. A white supremacist must simply care more about whites than any other, and he has quite clearly defined them as subjectively supreme, to him--after all it overarches all other races, and that is the definition of supreme. There is no escaping white supremacy then, if you care more about whites than other races, you are a white supremacist--they are supreme in your heart. They take the supreme place. They are on top.

Subjective white supremacy can only be held by very confused non-whites, unlike objective white supremacy which should be held by any honest person on earth. Subjective white supremacy is the natural and instinctual and healthy and normal state of whites, the counterpart to every other group preferring their own and caring about their own. Whites who don’t love whites or care about how whites are doing all around the world, are race traitors, unnatural, they are like lepers and it hurts to even be around them, they are so offensive to our instinctual grasp of right and wrong. Whites cheering for blacks against whites in a sport, a war, a nobel prize award, a courtship, are all despicable and immediately yield the question: ‘what is wrong with that person? Doesn’t he know his own? Doesn’t he love himself? Why would he do such a perverted thing?’ If you don’t wish to see white interests secured first and foremost, above anyone else’s, if you don’t choose for the white to be happy or safe or free, if a choice must be made, then you’re not a white supremacist. Congratulations, you’ve completely denatured and castrated your moral sense, you can now join the ash heap of history with your non-evolutionarily successful views. For anyone who doesn’t hold whites supreme, will immediately lose to anyone who holds non-whites supreme, and while you go on compromising and giving away your interests, they will cling to all of theirs. While whites are cheering (I’m not even kidding, they cheered Bill Clinton in his speech in Portland announcing this fact) their coming minority status in the USA, hispanics are cheering their coming majority status in the USA. Both people can’t be right. If it’s good to be a minority and dispossessed of your own land, then hispanics should be mourning their coming, woeful, hateful majority status. Somehow they don’t buy it though, somehow they don’t agree with whites in thinking majoritydom is all that hateful and bad, somehow they are quite happy with this result. Either one or the other strategy is correct. I believe in the one that will live. I believe in the one that grows. I believe in the one that lasts.

Does white supremacism make any distinction between wishing whites well defensively versus aggressively? No, it does not. Objectively speaking, wanting the survival of the fittest, ‘may the best man win,’ would of course imply wishing to see whites spread and grow and flourish, as the truest inheritors of perfection, there would be no desire to see it stay at 8% of the world’s population, while failed, imperfect, shoddy hominids of others sorts were 92%. It would be seen as a horrible travesty, if whites stayed on earth perfectly defensively, keeping all their current land, while non-whites went off to colonize the universe. It would be a moral failure to not afford the best people the best chance at life. To not reward greatness with material goods, to somehow grovel and inch along on the edges and dregs of existence while placating our lessers and inferiors with all the fruits and pleasures of life. If we are better, we deserve better, and should get better, than our inferiors. This same logic extends not just between the races, but between species. Superior species deserve better and more than inferior ones, like bugs, rodents, bacteria, and cockroaches. Just as humans deserve the lion’s share of resources and happiness and rights over non-humans, and bugs and germs deserve the least and worst spot in life, just as human interests trump non-human interests, the objectively superior white race deserves the lion’s share of the world, and the dregs should go to the dregs. If we were superior, but deserved nothing more, then what would being superior mean? What would it all be for? Are we seriously supposed to divide the world equally between apes and man? Between mud huts and skyscrapers? Between criminals and citizens? Superior always implies valuing them more, it cannot mean anything else, and those who are of higher value, deserve more than those of lesser value.

I submit to you that the greatest thing that ever happened in world history, was the colonization of much of the world by the superior white race. The conquest and colonization of North and South America, Australia, South Africa, and New Zealand was the high point of world history. It was the flowering of the greatest race receiving its just reward, the greatest share of world population. It was matching our excellence to our rewards, our achievements to our population, our supremacy to our property. I submit to you that it was moral and good to wipe out the scattered tribes of stone age barbarians all around the world and replace them with hundreds of millions of beautiful, brilliant white families. I submit to you that it would be a good thing to do it now, today, again. That the world doesn’t belong to anyone in particular, that it is up for grabs between all lifeforms, that the best prevail in seizing it, that this de facto makes them the best, and the best deserve nothing short of the colonization of the world. I submit to you that homo sapiens did just this in their wiping out of neanderthals and homo habilus and all the other junk species long ago, and that it was moral for them to do so, because they were better and deserved better than their inferiors. I submit to you that we should take it all back, return to our just spot in the world, not as 8% of the population, but 40% like in 1900, and that we of all people deserve the stars. We should never allow the universe to slip away from us, we should never give away the future as someone else’s property, we should be first and foremost in everything, we should rule. Just as humans dominate the inanimate, anmal, and plant kingdoms, the best are the natural rulers of the world, and naturally who we wish to see survive AND grow, AND flourish, AND prosper. It is ridiculous to hold we are the best, but that therefore we only deserve 8% of the world, or that we can only defend our slowly dwindling land masses in some rear guard action. If we are the best, we deserve the best, and that’s that.

And that chain of logic, of course, is why people are so opposed to white supremacism. Because in its implications, in its logical results, in its chain of reasoning, once you say whites are supreme either objectively or subjectively, you must also say they deserve the supreme share, the supreme good, the supreme victory, the supreme triumph over all others. You must immediately, logically, follow up by saying they should be supreme. But, does it help to shrink away from logic and reason? If it is logical and reasonable to be a white supremacist, if any honest person would be so no matter how they fight it, and if it is logical and reasonable that the superior should triumph and rule over the inferior, that the superior should succeed and the inferior fail, the superior grow and the inferior shrink, that the superior should replace the inferior and not the inferior the superior---then what choice does an honest person have?

What choice an honest thinker but go the whole way? What choice a moral person than to cheer for the most ‘immoral’ deeds? What choice but to rethink everything we were ever taught and start revering the true heroes of history? The colonists, the imperialists, the racists, everyone who helped not white ‘survival’, which was never their interest and would’ve sounded like a joke to them, the strongest people on earth, but white power, white rule, white imperium, white fecundity, white wealth, white victory. Was it not heroes who defeated the incas and aztecs? Heroes who drove out the mongols from Russia, the turks from Europe, the maoris from new zealand, the zulus from south africa, the apaches from the West, the muslims from sicily and spain, on and on? Were not our greatest presidents also generals who fought the Indians so that the white race might spread and prevail and grow and rule? Weren’t Hong Kong and Macao good things? Wasn’t Perry opening up trade with Japan a good thing? Isn’t Canada and Argentina better than what came before? Aren’t we glad France turned back the non-white tide at Tours? How is there any difference, the essence remains the same, defensive or offensive, what we celebrate, what we enjoy, is whites winning. Whites maintaining their power and success in the world. There can be no morality that artificially, arbitrarily draws a line and says ‘white rule is moral here but immoral there.’ ‘a white population is good on this square acre but bad on that one.’ It is meaningless. If it’s good, it’s good. It’s good anywhere, everywhere. If it’s better than anything else, it’s best, it should be striven for, it’s a good outcome when it happens. Though arguments can be made that objectively, non-whites are superior in some fields and thus should be, by dint of merit, given the just rewards of their supremacy, it would of course fall short of 92% of the world. It would fall short of 50% of the world. Whatever the fair debatable figure is, it is not today’s figure, and thus doesn’t matter. Another argument could be that like zoos or the endangered species act, even completely inferior beings should be allowed some representation on earth as simply a curiosity or exotic diversity, but such reservations would be small and essentially meaningless--it would not change the moral calculus. As far as today goes, all that can be said is whites deserve far, far better than any rear guard, or defense, or holding action, could give. For the people who created virtually everything good on earth, who created the technology and culture that allows for the carrying capacity of 6.7 billion people in the first place, to be the ever dwindling minority of the enjoyers of their own creation, is a grave injustice. A cosmic injustice. Whites must benefit from white achievement proportional to their achievement, non-whites should not be allowed to be the prime beneficiaries, the evolutionary victors, for things they never even did. For things they never were and never will be. Whites deserve better, they invented the very way of life the rest of the world is living, they afforded it with their miraculous systems and devices, and now they are to be dispossessed of it all--the very wealth and happiness they created, that non-whites had no hand in making, but consume voraciously. Preposterous. We morally can take back the entirety of our contribution, which is debatable, but well over 50%, of all the world’s goods. 8% is a joke, our coming 1% is a sin.

To sum up, white supremacism is holding that whites are either objectively superior, or subjectively superior in your love for them, just like a ‘family supremacist’ who cares more about his children than someone else’s children. Both are natural and logical, neither can be denied by any sensible white, the facts support the first case, emotions and human nature supports the second. Only pretzel people can avoid being white supremacists, and they are nothing but jokes and lepers to those of us who remain. White supremacy being true and right, it only follows that white supremacy in the material world, in resource allocation, in well-being, in power, in population, should also be good and right. If we are better, we deserve better. If we are the best, we deserve the best. White supremacy therefore advocates whites, in fact, be supreme. Starting from the initial cause that we are the happiest, brightest, fittest, most beautiful, most accomplished, best exemplars of the human race and indeed all life, we deserve nothing less than the best results, the best situation, the best position, the supreme height of the food chain, the pecking order, the totem pole. Winners should win. Anything less is a crime against nature. Any less support by a white for whites, is an act of race treason. By either definition, whites must support their own, all the way to the hilt, and though the environment means we can’t enact such a morality, we can at least celebrate the time it did---The Age of Exploration, the Enlightenment, the whitening of the world that lasted until WWI, was indeed our finest hour. This pathetic groveling and decay, our darkest. With that in mind, we can keep the flame alive--for the age of salvation and rebirth.

Monday, January 12, 2009

Holohoax brainwashing turned up - German children forced to visit concentration camp sites in order to fight "far right extremism"

More evidence that the Holohoax is not history. It's an ideology, a social engineering tool...used to demonize white nationalism in general, and conversely to enforce the multi-racial Third World immigration agenda being used to destroy white nations.

story: "German children will be forced to see concentration camp sites"

Racemixing is Not Christian

Racemixing is Not Christian

Sermon Notes of Pastor Mark Downey

Christian Identity has restored one of the most prevalent issues found in the Word of God and that is the subject of race. However, in an attempt to bring forward the righteous corrections of faulty teachings, it is somewhat like revisionist historians dealing with the holocaust industry. Christian Identity does not enjoy the glut monopoly of merchandising information as does the establishment religions and media, although we do have a gift of discernment and an unwavering love for truth wherever it may lead. What we have been told about race in the Bible has been an unmitigated fraud to destroy us. What the Bible actually says about race will preserve us. We are like David standing up against Goliath having a wealth of encyclopedic facts to sanction the mixing of the races. This has been accomplished over a long period of time by contaminating the historical record and the Bible itself with disinformation.

I have been called to task recently to prove the Christian Identity Truth (it is not a theory like evolution), and will do so from the Word/Law of God. A law, like the law of gravity, is not just a good idea or suggestion; it is an established foundation, absolute and infallible. Hence, the foundations of Creation and the purpose for which we are here become all important. I have been challenged to stand and deliver, not from the judeo-christian crowd, but from anti-Christian racialists. I would preface racialists by saying alleged.

This issue of whether race mixing is advocated or prohibited in the Bible was prompted by a message I gave about "Why Some People Just don't Get It"; "it" being the identity of the White race in relation to the Bible. We live in a time when there is an increase of information. People can choose what to believe from so many sources, that the average person cannot read it all in their lifetime. So they depend on the marketplace of ideas of what makes sense to them. Preconceived notions and intellectual prejudices will always color what people select as their truth. This then becomes a reflection of what they are in life and what they give or take from their own race.

Putting forth the premise that race mixing is not Christian automatically prompts cries of foul from all quarters. But the division is basically two sided. When the Bible says, "Prove all things" it is quickly followed by the admonition to hold on to the good. In the eternal war of words we are warned that some people will turn good into evil and evil into good. If someone chooses to not only ignore the Bible, but to misrepresent it, it then becomes a matter of changing the truth of God into a lie. Who could that possibly be? It would be those who have made the wrong choice and have selected proof that is not good. For example, the jewish holocaust is riddled with false proof and yet some people accept it as fact. This produces evil consequences. If we reject and distort what the Bible has to say about race mixing, we likewise will suffer evil upon our society. That's exactly what has happened to our nation. The battle between good and evil determines blessings or curses.

In seeking to determine what the Bible teaches, it is necessary to start at the beginning. Nobody can squirm around the basic premise of Adam and Eve being of the same race. I don't know of any versions that say they were the first two Orientals or Negroes. History depicts them as White. Christian Identity further identifies them by rightly dividing the word Adam, which means man. Strong's Concordance elaborates on this kind of man (#119, 120) being ruddy, to show blood in the face, i.e. to blush or turn rosy. From Thomas O'Brien's book "Verboten" we glean from his commentary that, "Even the ability to blush (show blood in the face) is confined to the White race. This is caused by your subconscious which only God controls, as He breathed His Living Spirit into Adam who passed it on to you, his White descendants. You are an infinitesimal projection of your Creator, so when you do or say something embarrassing, your subconscious rushes blood to your face. The colored races, not having been endowed with God's Spirit, have no abstract sense of right or wrong, consequently are never embarrassed." It is a misnomer to call other races or species mankind. In the book of Genesis, God's Law of kind after kind was established, meaning species. The Bible we have in our hands today repeatedly teaches about 'seed after its own kind' in which each and every species of plants and animals propagate within their own kind. In the case of Adamkind, it is clearly the White race. The Bible interprets itself by declaring that "This is the book of the generations of Adam" (Gen. 5:1). Generations means the genetic posterity. You can read more details in the article "The Adamic Creation".

Let me give you a thumbnail sketch of the rest of Genesis as it pertains to race mixing. Obviously there were other races as we read about the first case of Adam's seed being polluted with Cain, a cursed murderer of his brother. Cain was purged from Eden and moved "east of Eden" (which would have been in and among the Mongolian people), to a non-Adamic land filled with non-Adamites. He then produced the first mongrel offspring named Enoch. From the time of Adam and Eve to the time of Noah, race mixing became epidemic, and God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth. This sin of race mixing is so serious that God killed the offenders. However, there was one man and his family that found grace in the eyes of the Lord, who was perfect in his generations; in other words, he was racially pure. The result of all this race mixing was corruption and violence (Genesis 6:11). The narrative establishes a paramount theme that runs throughout the Bible: race mixing is not Christian.

There are indeed two manners of people in the world: those who remain racially pure and those who don't. The problem again arises with the twin boys, Jacob and Esau, fulfilling their separate destinies from the time of their birth. History also shows that whenever these people sought to integrate and intermarry, the results were always the same: violence, confusion and judgment from God. On the other hand, when they lived separately as God ordered, each respectively lived in harmony apart from each other. History also shows that whenever the racially pure offspring of Jacob failed to assume their God-mandated office of taking dominion and administering God's Laws, conversely allowing the offspring of Esau to occupy and determine the law of the land, there has been nothing but trouble, chaos and God's judgment. Destruction of White Christian civilization is the primary purpose of the jewish drive towards racial amalgamation. They know that it has always been White Christian society that has proclaimed liberty throughout the land and are the custodians of freedom. So in order to control the world, this element of God's Spirit must go to the grave in various forms of genocide. Historians and social engineers know that a mongrelized people is easier to control, because they have a deformed spirit and no identity. These destroyers of mankind know that every White civilization (and there have been some 25 of these civilizations in the sixty centuries of recorded history) that has practiced race mixing, has destroyed themselves from within. You want to talk about fairy tales? There has never been a great Black civilization in Africa and mongrels have never been able to rule their subjects justly. South Africa enjoyed White Christian apartheid until its Christian faith was undermined by antichrist distortions of the Word. It is now the murder capital of the world.

Esau would corrupt his racial line by marrying into another race, which was strictly forbidden. He took a wife of the Hittites which was "a grief of mind" to his parents. "And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan" (Gen.28:1). This command not to marry into another race was the same one given by Abraham concerning Isaac, where he told his son to find his wife in his country and among his kindred (his own kind). Deuteronomy 32:8 clearly states that God separated the races, "When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds [borderlines] of the people according to the number of the children of Israel." The White race at that time had their land and the other races had theirs. This verse tells us that there is a specific number of White Adamic Israelites to be born in order to fulfill the plan of God. How can any racialist complain about this kind of orderly separation?

Throughout Scriptures we find that God's order in every realm has always been separation, selection and discrimination, while the enemies of God and the White race have always been integration, equality and tolerance. The surest way to prevent White people from achieving their manifest destiny is to prevent them from reproducing their own kind. The strategy of our enemy is to mix the races and produce what the Bible calls "bastards". The Hebrew word for bastard is "mamzer" and means a mongrel or half-breed. "A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord" Deut. 23:2. Churches are full of smiling mamzers who are told the Bible says to mix. The propaganda we struggle against today is from those who misrepresent the Word of God and falsely identify who God's people married in the Old Testament times in an effort to justify race mixing. They do not have the Spirit of God, in which our body, the temple of God, facilitates the indwelling of God. Without a spirit-filled race, there is no possibility of White people fulfilling our purpose on earth. Fornication (which is race mixing) adulterates God's plan for the Ages. God does not dwell in a racially adulterated habitation. If you remove Christianity from the world, you remove God's law prohibiting race mixing.


read the rest


The myth of the "brotherhood" of humanity; Adam not the first man, but father of only the white race

Yahweh Prohibits Race-Mixing and Commands Racial Purity and Segregation

The Mystery of the True Descendants of the Israelites - The White Anglo-Saxon, Germanic, Scandinavian, and Kindred Peoples

Saturday, January 10, 2009

Stephen Whittle's ("Luke O'Farrell"s) Last Column: "Brave Jew World"

After reading the work of these men, I see why the Jewish Mafia has attempted to silence them - well-written, hard-hitting, insightful commentary that focuses in on the primary enemy, the Jew.

Brave Jew World - The Enver is Nigh

9th March 2008

Birds do it, bees do it, even educated fleas do it – but let’s not do it, let’s not look after our own interests! After all, we’re white, members of an innately evil, vicious and exploitative race. We whites are the serpent in the ethnic Garden of Eden, the fork-tongued originators of all that is hateful and harmful in the world. Just imagine what a paradise it would be without us. No wars, no conflict, no racism – no bigotry or prejudice of any kind. Everyone would live in peace and harmony, sharing the blessings bestowed by Mother Nature. The rivers would run with milk and honey, the skies would fill with sweetly singing bluebirds. Lions would lie down with lambs, scorpions would refuse to sting, mosquitoes to bite.

Alas, the world isn’t white-free and our innate evil is still wreaking havoc. It causes oppression and pollution in China, forces blacks to rape and murder each other in Africa, creates typhoid, cholera and bubonic plague, makes toast land butter-side-down on a global basis. Yes, there’s no doubt about it: the white race truly is, in the resonant phrase of the Jewish intellectual Susan Sontag, “the cancer of human history”.

Not that Sue’s the only Jewish intellectual to pursue that admirable white-bashing theme. There’s the former Harvard academic Noël Ignatiev too, with his crusading call for us to “Abolish the white race”, to “keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed – not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.” Both Sue and Noël owe their insights to Karl Marx, the Jewish intellectual who taught us how to reach a better world by climbing a mountain or two of corpses and wading through a few rivers of blood. Britain’s not been left out: Marx-loving Margaret Hodge, our super, soar-away “Minister of Culture”, is a third white-bashing Jewish intellectual:


read the rest here

On the Heretical Two, Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle - Legal Update, official website, jail contact info

Heretical Two's Website: The Heretical Press

Legal Update:

The asylum proceedings are not scheduled to be held until March:

The first immigration court session was held on September 17 with Bruce Leichty as defence attorney. The judge claimed that she did not have the power to release the Heretical Two under the defensive procedures adopted by the US authorities. The ‘asylum-only proceedings’ for the Heretical Two was heard by immigration judge, Rose Peters, on October 14. The move by their attorney to get them released before the ruling on asylum was denied by the judge, whose reasoning appeared contradictory. At the ‘calendar meeting’ of the immigration court on Thursday 13 November - the judge set the merits (main) appeal for three afternoons in blocks of four hours from 2 pm on March 10, 12 and 24 of 2009. It therefore looks very likely that the H2 will spend at least another 4 months in prison in the USA for activities in America which the British government now deems to be crimes, i.e. exercising the right to free speech, but which ironically are not held to be crimes under American law. Simon's retrial on the outstanding six charges, one charge was dropped, was held in his absence, as the British government was not prepared to wait for the outcome of the political asylum proceedings in the US. The new trial commenced on Monday December 8 at Leeds Crown Court and was deferred on December 22 to January 5, 2009 - the following day the jury went out to deliberate and on January 8 found Simon guilty on three counts relating to Tales of the Holocaust and later in the day, by a majority verdict on two charges relating to Don't be Sheeple - even Professor Rabkin's cogent arguments that the Jews were a religion and not a race had failed to impress the jury. Although the establishment have so far managed to contain news on the case to cold, slanted and shameless reports in the Yorkshire and Lancashire press, without any discussion of any of the many issues arising the case, the Heretical Two are, at least, getting some publicity at last.

Contact Info:

They are currently being held under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) System at Santa Ana Jail, P.O. Box 22003, Santa Ana, CA 92701, USA. Simon's prison number is 0800006404 and Stephen's number is 0800006408. Please write, but do not place return address stickers on envelopes; all labels are removed and they would be unable to reply.


Sheppard, Simon 0800006404
c/o Santa Ana Jail
P.O. Box 22003
Santa Ana, CA 92701 USA

Whittle, Stephen 0800006408
c/o Santa Ana Jail
P.O. Box 22003
Santa Ana, CA 92701 USA

Thursday, January 8, 2009

Grimm: The Devil Is On the Doorstep

Article reproduced in full:

The Devil Is On the Doorstep

By Patrick Grimm
Thursday, May 31, 2007

There is an old axiom that informs us that "the devil is in the details." This is, at its most basic, a piece of wisdom reminding us to read the fine print when signing contracts or hearing information and promises that seem "too good to be true."

But what do you do when the devil is not in the details? What is to be done when the devil is not furtive, is not using stealth anymore, but is perched instead on the doorstep and knocking in a hostile and bellicose manner? This is our trouble, for the devil is no longer content to work behind the scenes, subtlely tugging at a string here and there to induce the dance he desires. Now the devil's attacks are open, brazen, barefaced, tawdry and unblushing in their intensity.

Big, huge hulking Jewry is done with playing the covert game to get what they want, and what they want is to run the whole world and they are so very close to achieving their sinister promise in this regard. They are proud to say "We are going to own you Goyim!" They never blush, they never apologize and they never ever back down from their frontal assaults on our rights and our Constitution. Strewn across the internet like so much garbage, like pools of toxic chemical waste, are the hitmen for their cause, already waiting with excuses, lies, indulgences and subterfuge for their brethren that debauch us.

Let me be very clear in my words. The agents of Big Jewry lie as naturally as they breathe. They don't even give it a thought. For them to even consider lying as something immoral would be like a fish contemplating deeply the reality that it is surrounded by water. It's a given. Their falsehoods, double-speak and duplicitousness are part of their make-up as sub-humans. Calling these devils part of the human family is much too generous and liberal. They are part of the "brood of vipers" Jesus Christ warned us of right before the smart boys of the Talmud knocked Him off to quiet His tongue. They can never bear the truth being told about them, but we can see that Christ had the last laugh, if you can even use such terms when referring to the Savior. The devils of Judaism killed every ancient critic they ever had, and they would love nothing more than to do the same today. These Satanic beings are at war with all humanity, and the truth, as always happens in a war, must become the first casualty.

The Beelzebubs of Big Jewry don't want dialogue. I figured that out a long time ago. They won't engage in dialogue because the truth is not on their side. The truth has never been on their side. Instead, as they hover like ghoulish gargoyles or scavenger birds at the door, they wait to rip us asunder. They are done with code words against us and hiding their identities. They want a war with Gentiles, at least of the Cold War variety. The shooting hasn't started yet, but the war of words certainly has. I am more than ready to give them the war they crave, like they have craved so many other wars (WWI, WWII) in the past.

Judaism, Big Jewry, Zionism and Jewish supremacism are all part of the devilish Mephistophelian blueprint they have for our world. They won't be needing us for much longer and soon these demons will put the final nail in the coffin, both figuratively and literally. The door will swing open, they will emerge from the doorstep to claim us and end us. We have allowed this to happen. Our Faustian bargain, our pluralistic tolerance for their crimes and their diabolical deeds will finally draw the curtain on our existence.

But it doesn't have to be this way. We must call a 'devil' a 'devil', and there is nothing more devilish and evil than Jewish excess. The human cost they have extracted from us like Shylock's "pound of flesh" is more than anyone should have to bear. But bear it we have, often with a smile and often with our arms and pocketbooks wipe open to pay for it all. No more, you Judaistic demons, no more! I won't be silent. I will engage in the war against the hellhounds of Big Jewry because I know that I am on the side of light and they sit, as they always do, on the side of darkness and disinformation and distortion and death.

So I say to the Evil Ones, the loathsome and vicious and perverted minions of the hell that is Judaistic thinking, the garbage heap that makes up their mentalities and minds, bring on the war! I will speak the truth and I will draw you out, even if that means gluing a penny to the floor. Come on into Zionist Watch and prove who you are with your insults, your gutter language, your sick scatological obsessions and your filth. You make a far better case for opposing and battling the Jewish agenda than anything I could say. But whatever you do, bring on the war!

"You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

-Jesus Christ

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

Kissinger: Various "crises" and Obama's international popularity a "great opportunity" for Obama to establish a "new world order"

article: Kissinger: Obama primed to create 'New World Order'

Kissinger's comments are captured at roughly the two-minute mark of the following video:

There's No Business Like Shoah Business!

You Too Can Be A Holocaust Survivor!

Becoming a Holocaust survivor will open millions of new horizons for you! A wide range of specialty fields in Shoah Business are open to you through the college of Hebrew Youth Public Education (HYPE.)

*Learn documentation alteration where you can make anyone into a wanted Nazi war criminal! Special instruction from former Soviet KGB operatives, the folks who gave our industry the famous, one-of-a-kind Demjanjuk SS ID Card!

*Major in kosher accounting, the most creative number-crunching system ever evolved, where everything add up to six million!

*Make your fortune in the lucrative field of reparations racketeering! Learn how to extort money from the European country of your choice by finding "Nazi gold" hidden in every bank account!

*Get into the incredibly profitable Holocaust book business! A hose nose and one of our diplomas will certify you as a Holocaust expert! In addition to the book sales there are the lecture tours, the media appearances, the guest speaker circuit at fancy-schmancy Holocaust drinkie-dos, and above all those eye-popping consultancy fees! Being a recognized Holocaust maven is a license to print money!

*Learn Holocaust Museum Management and have your own personal fantasy land! Maybe even build your own Holocaust theme park complete with weekend package tours in an authentic replica Nazi concentration camp, complete with striped suits, wash-off tattooed numbers, KZ ration meals and SS-uniformed "guards"!*

*Like to travel? Then become a professional war crimes witness!

At graduation from HYPE you will receive a diploma, a tattoo (your social security number, but no one will ever be so impolite as to point it out), and your meal ticket for life!

Fairy tales can come true! It can happen to you at Hebrew Youth Public Education!

Friday, January 2, 2009

Sea Ice in Arctic expanding at fastest rate on record - Ice cover at 1979 levels

article: "Sea Ice Ends Year at Same Level as 1979"

All Articles on the "Global Warming - Climate Change" Scam

Some of the reasons exposing the "global warming"-"climate change" scam

The earth has warmed and cooled in cycles throughout history. So of course there will always be "climate change", and periods of global warming...and global cooling. We've had "ice ages" or cold periods, very warm periods centuries ago, to the climate of today. And we're currently having one of the coldest winters in the Northern Hemisphere on record, dealing a serious blow to the Jewish-Elite agenda of casting "global warming" as some "serious problem" being "caused by man-made CO2 emissions", forcing them to shift tactics and re-label the "problem" -- ie, squealing about "climate change" and hysterically claiming that "polar bears are dying out", in spite of experts noting that polar bear populations are rising.

Carbon dioxide from fossil fuels and other man-made factors have very very little impact upon the climate. The prime factor in the climate is the sun.

source: Telegraph

Global warming: Reasons why it might not actually exist

2008 was the year man-made global warming was disproved, according to the Telegraph's Christopher Booker. Sceptics have long argued that there are other explanations for climate change other than man-made CO2 and here we look at some of the arguments put forward by those who believe that global warming is all a hoax.

30 Dec 2008

Temperatures are falling, not rising

As Christopher Booker says in his review of 2008, temperatures have been dropping in a wholly unpredicted way over the past year. Last winter, the northern hemisphere saw its greatest snow cover since 1966, which in the northern US states and Canada was dubbed the "winter from hell". This winter looks set to be even worse.

The earth was hotter 1,000 years ago

Evidence from all over the world indicates that the earth was hotter 1,000 years ago than it is today. Research shows that temperatures were higher in what is known as the Mediaeval Warming period than they were in the 1990s.

The earth's surface temperature is not at record levels

According to Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies analysis of surface air temperature measurements, the meteorological December 2007 to November 2008 was the coolest year since 2000. Their data has also shown that the hottest decade of the 20th century was not the 1990s but the 1930s.

Ice is not disappearing

Arctic website Crysophere Today reported that Arctic ice volume was 500,000 sq km greater than this time last year. Additionally, Antarctic sea-ice this year reached its highest level since satellite records began in 1979. Polar bear numbers are also at record levels.

Himalayan glaciers

A report by the UN Environment Program this year claimed that the cause of melting glaciers in the Himalayas was not global warming but the local warming effect of a vast "atmospheric brown cloud" over that region, made up of soot particles from Asia's dramatically increased burning of fossil fuels and deforestation.

Temperatures are still dropping

Nasa satellite readings on global temperatures from the University of Alabama show that August was the fourth month this year when temperatures fell below their 30-year average, ie since satellite records began. November 2008 in the USA was only the 39th warmest since records began 113 years ago.

Vast vast majority of white Americans have absolutely no connection to African slavery in America


The Real Slave Traders

Friday, January 02, 2009

For decades, the White people of America have been subjected to a continual barrage from blacks and others that you and I are somehow responsible for the African slave trade and that we need to atone for our "guilt." There are a number of flaws with the idea that we are somehow responsible for the African slave trade.

First of all, very few White people even owned slaves--slavery was a rich man's luxury and slavery did not exist amongst the middle and working classes of White people.

Second of all, even if every one of us had an ancestor who owned slaves (which is an extremely unlikely proposition) it makes little sense to blame the children for the supposed sins of their fathers.

Third of all, it is a fact that blacks sold their own kind into slavery. As this is the case, blacks are every bit as much to blame for slavery as are Whites. Arabs raided territories of negro tribes, enslaving the strong, killing the weak.

Fourth, European Whites did not bring the slaves to America. On the contrary, it was the Asiatic Jews who brought them here (as Louis Farakhan has also pointed out.) Below is a listing of the Jewish slave ships and the Jewish owners of them.

Abigail, Crown, Nassau, Four Sisters - (Anne & Eliza Prudent - Jews)
Betty - (Aaron Lopez, Jew)
Hester - (Moses Levy, Jew)
Elizabeth - (Jacob Franks - Jew)
Antigua - (Isaac Levy - Jew)
Betsy - (Moses Levy - Jew)
Polly White - (Justus Bosch and John Abrams - Jew)
Horse and Expedition - (Mordecai and David Gomez - Jews)
Charlotte - (Marston and Abram Lyell - Jews)
Caracoa - (William de Woolf - Jew)

Source: Elizabeth Donnan, 4 Volumes, Documents Illustrative of the History of the Slave Trade to America Washington, D.C. 1930, 1935 Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh, Pa.

So, my fellow White American, there is nothing whatsoever to feel guilty about concerning slavery. It is time to quit apologizing for something others are responsible for.

Besides, approximately six hundred thousand White soldiers died in the American Civil War. Have you ever heard of blacks paying homage to or thanking these men?

I would also add the following important point. A very large percentage of the current white-European population of the United States are descendants of people who immigrated to North America after the 1860s and the period of the war between the Confederacy and the Union -- in the great immigration waves of the late 1800s and early 1900s. Therefore, these whites obviously could not have owned slaves.

So knowing that at the time of slavery only the very rich actually owned slaves, and the vast majority of whites were poor rural farmers who did not own slaves...and knowing that a large portion of whites in America are descended from people who immigrated to the United States after slavery was outlawed as an institution...I would estimate that only 1-2% (if not lower) of white people in the United States today are descended from people who ever owned slaves.

Furthermore, not all slaves in the Americas were black Africans. Although this fact has been white-washed from the jewish-controlled psuedo "history" taught today, there were thousands, if not millions, of white slaves as well.


Suppressed History: White Slavery in Early America and Industrial Britain